首页> 中文期刊> 《世界核心医学期刊文摘:胃肠病学分册》 >侵蚀性与非侵蚀性胃食管反流病中的食管运动障碍:两者是否不同?

侵蚀性与非侵蚀性胃食管反流病中的食管运动障碍:两者是否不同?

         

摘要

cqvip:Background: In GERD patients, ineffective esophageal motility(IEM), a hypocont ractile disorder, is the most common motor abnormality. IEM has been associated with reflux in both the supine and upright position, prolonged esophageal cleara nce,and delayed of bolus transport. IEM has been equally present in erosive and in nonerosive GERD. Goal: Considering that reflux has been found to be more seve re in erosive GERD than in nonerosive GERD patients and that IEM delays esophage al clearance, our hypothesis is that patients with erosive GERD have more severe IEM than those with nonerosive disease.Study: A retrospective review of consecu tive manometries of patients with the chief complaint of heartburn and a diagnos is of IEM were performed, and patients with both erosive and nonerosive GERD wer e selected. According to the number of ineffective contractions, IEM was stratif ied into three groups:30%to 40%, mild; 50%to 60%, moderate; and greater than 60%, severe. We also registered the number of low amplitude,failed, and normal waves in each manometry of both groups.We evaluated 110 patients: 70 (64%) wit h erosive GERD and 40 (36%)with nonerosive GERD. The percentage of mild,moderat e and severe IEM was similar in erosive and in nonerosive GERD patients, as well the number of low amplitude, failed or normal waves (P< 0.5). Conclusion: There were no differences between the severity of IEM in erosive and in nonerosive GE RD patients.

著录项

相似文献

  • 中文文献
  • 外文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号