首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Applied and Environmental Microbiology >New Method Using a Positively Charged Microporous Filter and Ultrafiltration for Concentration of Viruses from Tap Water
【2h】

New Method Using a Positively Charged Microporous Filter and Ultrafiltration for Concentration of Viruses from Tap Water

机译:带正电微孔过滤器和超滤技术浓缩自来水病毒的新方法

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The methods used to concentrate enteric viruses from water have remained largely unchanged for nearly 30 years, with the most common technique being the use of 1MDS Virozorb filters followed by organic flocculation for secondary concentration. Recently, a few studies have investigated alternatives; however, many of these methods are impractical for use in the field or share some of the limitations of this traditional method. In the present study, the NanoCeram virus sampler, an electropositive pleated microporous filter composed of microglass filaments coated with nanoalumina fibers, was evaluated. Test viruses were first concentrated by passage of 20 liters of seeded water through the filter (average filter retention efficiency was ≥99.8%), and then the viruses were recovered using various salt-based or proteinaceous eluting solutions. A 1.0% sodium polyphosphate solution with 0.05 M glycine was determined to be the most effective. The recovered viruses were then further concentrated using Centricon Plus-70 centrifugal ultrafilters to a final volume of 3.3 (±0.3 [standard deviation]) ml; this volume compares quite favorably to that of previously described methods, such as organic flocculation (∼15 to 40 ml). The overall virus recovery efficiencies were 66% for poliovirus 1, 83% for echovirus 1, 77% for coxsackievirus B5, 14% for adenovirus 2, and 56% for MS2 coliphage. In addition, this method appears to be compatible with both cell culture and PCR assays. This new approach for the recovery of viruses from water is therefore a viable alternative to currently used methods when small volumes of final concentrate are an advantage.
机译:近30年以来,用于从水中浓缩肠病毒的方法基本保持不变,最常见的技术是使用1MDS Virozorb过滤器,然后进行有机絮凝进行二次浓缩。最近,一些研究已经研究了替代方案。但是,这些方法中的许多方法在现场使用都是不切实际的,或者有一些传统方法的局限性。在本研究中,对NanoCeram病毒采样器进行了评估,它是一种由涂有纳米氧化铝纤维的微玻璃丝组成的正电打褶微孔过滤器。首先通过使20升种子水通过过滤器来浓缩测试病毒(平均过滤器保留效率≥99.8%),然后使用各种盐基或蛋白质洗脱溶液回收病毒。确定具有1.0 M甘氨酸的1.0%多磷酸钠溶液是最有效的。然后,使用Centricon Plus-70离心超滤器将回收的病毒进一步浓缩至最终体积为3.3(±0.3 [标准偏差])毫升。该体积与先前描述的方法(例如有机絮凝(约15至40 ml))相比非常有利。脊髓灰质炎病毒1的总体病毒恢复效率为66%,回声病毒1的为83%,柯萨奇病毒B5的77%,腺病毒2的14%,MS2噬菌体的56%。此外,该方法似乎与细胞培养和PCR分析均兼容。因此,当少量最终浓缩物是一种优势时,这种从水中回收病毒的新方法是目前使用的方法的可行替代方案。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号