• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>British Medical Journal >Christmas 2016: Food for Thought: We read spam a lot: prospective cohort study of unsolicited and unwanted academic invitations
【2h】

Christmas 2016: Food for Thought: We read spam a lot: prospective cohort study of unsolicited and unwanted academic invitations

机译：2016年圣诞节：值得深思的内容：我们经常阅读垃圾邮件：针对未经请求和不需要的学术邀请进行的前瞻性队列研究

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务，本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文，但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁，仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况，如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

>Objectives To assess the amount, relevance, content, and suppressibility of academic electronic spam invitations to attend conferences or submit manuscripts.>Design Prospective cohort study.>Setting Email accounts of participating academics.>Participants Five intrepid academics and a great many publishers, editors, and conference organisers.>Intervention Unsubscribing from sender’s distribution lists.>Main outcome measures Number of spam invitations received before, immediately after, and one year after unsubscribing from senders’ distribution lists. The proportion of duplicate invitations was also assessed and the relevance of each invitation graded to the recipient’s research interests. A qualitative assessment of the content of spam invitations was conducted.>Results At baseline, recipients received an average of 312 spam invitations each month. Unsubscribing reduced the frequency of the invitations by 39% after one month but by only 19% after one year. Overall, 16% of spam invitations were duplicates and 83% had little or no relevance to the recipients’ research interests. Spam invitations were characterised by inventive language, flattery, and exuberance, and they were sometimes baffling and amusing.>Conclusions Academic spam is common, repetitive, often irrelevant, and difficult to avoid or prevent.
机译：>目标：评估学术电子垃圾邮件邀请参加会议或提交手稿的数量，相关性，内容和可否性。>设计前瞻性队列研究。>设置参与研究人员的电子邮件帐户。>参与者。五位勇敢的学者以及许多出版商，编辑和会议组织者。>干预。退订发件人的分发列表。>主要成果指标。退订发件人的分发列表之前，之后和一年后收到的垃圾邮件邀请数。还评估了重复邀请的比例，并根据接收者的研究兴趣对每个邀请的相关性进行了评级。对垃圾邮件邀请的内容进行了定性评估。>结果。在基线时，收件人每月平均收到312个垃圾邮件邀请。取消订阅后，一个月后邀请的频率降低了39％，但一年后仅降低了19％。总体而言，垃圾邮件邀请中有16％是重复的，而有83％与收件人的研究兴趣无关。垃圾邮件邀请的特征是创造性的语言，奉承和兴高采烈，有时令人困惑和有趣。>结论学术垃圾邮件是常见的，重复的，通常无关的并且难以避免或预防。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号