首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Clinical Medicine. Cardiology >Design and Rationale of the Femoral Closure versus Radial Compression Devices Related to Percutaneous Coronary Interventions (FERARI) Study
【2h】

Design and Rationale of the Femoral Closure versus Radial Compression Devices Related to Percutaneous Coronary Interventions (FERARI) Study

机译:与经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(FERARI)研究相关的股骨闭合与Rad骨加压装置的设计和原理

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

BACKGROUNDBleeding events after percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI) are associated with patients’ age, gender, and the presence of chronic kidney disease, antithrombotic treatment, as well as arterial access site. Patients being treated by PCI using radial access site are associated with an improved prognosis. However, the safety of femoral closure devices has never been compared to radial compression devices following PCI. Therefore, the aim of this study is to evaluate the safety of femoral closure compared to radial compression devices in patients treated by PCI envisaging access site bleedings as well as short- and long-term prognostic outcomes.
机译:背景技术经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)后的出血事件与患者的年龄,性别以及是否存在慢性肾脏疾病,抗血栓治疗以及动脉通路有关。使用radial骨入路部位接受PCI治疗的患者预后改善。但是,从未将股骨闭合装置的安全性与PCI后的径向压缩装置进行比较。因此,这项研究的目的是评估经PCI介入治疗的患者中股骨闭合与放射状加压设备相比的安全性,该患者预期进入部位出血以及短期和长期预后。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号