• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Implementation Science : IS >Study protocol: an evaluation of the effectiveness experiences and costs of a patient-directed strategy compared with a multi-faceted strategy to implement physical cancer rehabilitation programmes for cancer survivors in a European healthcare system; a controlled before and after study
【2h】

Study protocol: an evaluation of the effectiveness experiences and costs of a patient-directed strategy compared with a multi-faceted strategy to implement physical cancer rehabilitation programmes for cancer survivors in a European healthcare system; a controlled before and after study

机译：研究方案：与欧洲医疗系统中针对癌症幸存者实施物理癌症康复计划的多方面策略相比以患者为导向的策略的有效性经验和成本进行评估；学习前后的对照

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务，本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文，但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁，仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况，如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

BackgroundThe need for physical cancer rehabilitation programmes (PCRPs), addressing adverse effects from cancer, is growing. Implementing these programmes into daily practice is still a challenge.Since barriers for successful implementation often arise at different levels in healthcare, multi-faceted strategies focusing on multiple levels are likely more effective than single-faceted strategies. Nevertheless, most studies implementing PCRPs used strategies directed at patients only. The aim of this study is to develop and identify the most effective strategy to implement PCRPs into daily care. We want to assess the added value of a multi-faceted strategy compared with a single-faceted patient-directed strategy.
机译：背景技术对物理癌症康复计划（PCRP）的需求日益增长，以应对癌症的不良影响。将这些计划实施到日常实践中仍然是一个挑战。由于成功实施的障碍常常出现在医疗保健的不同级别，因此关注多个级别的多方面策略可能比单方面策略更有效。但是，大多数实施PCRP的研究仅使用针对患者的策略。这项研究的目的是开发和确定将PCRP应用于日常护理的最有效策略。我们希望评估与面向患者的单方面策略相比的多方面策略的附加值。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
代理获取

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号