• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Health Research Policy and Systems >Valuing the scholarship of integration and the scholarship of application in the academy for health sciences scholars: recommended methods
【2h】

Valuing the scholarship of integration and the scholarship of application in the academy for health sciences scholars: recommended methods

机译：评估健康科学研究院的整合奖学金和应用奖学金：推荐方法

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务，本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文，但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁，仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况，如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

In the landmark 1990 publication Scholarship Reconsidered, Boyer challenged the 'teaching verses research debates' by advocating for the scholarship of discovery, teaching, integration, and application. The scholarship of discovery considers publications and research as the yardstick in the merit, promotion and tenure system the world over. But this narrow view of scholarship does not fully support the obligations of universities to serve global societies and to improve health and health equity. Mechanisms to report the scholarship of teaching have been developed and adopted by some universities. In this article, we contribute to the less developed areas of scholarship, i.e. integration and application. We firstly situate the scholarship of discovery, teaching, integration and application within the interprofessional and knowledge exchange debates. Second, we propose a means for health science scholars to report the process and outcomes of the scholarship of integration and application with other disciplines, decision-makers and communities. We conclude with recommendations for structural and process change in faculty merit, tenure, and promotion systems so that health science scholars with varied academic portfolios are valued and many forms of academic scholarship are sustained. It is vital academic institutions remain relevant in an era when the production of knowledge is increasingly recognized as a social collaborative activity.
机译：在具有里程碑意义的1990年出版的《重新考虑奖学金》中，博耶主张倡导发现，教学，整合和应用的奖学金，挑战了“教学诗研究辩论”。发现奖学金将出版物和研究视为世界范围内功绩，晋升和任期制度的准绳。但是，这种对奖学金的狭view看法并不能完全支持大学为全球社会服务以及改善健康和健康公平的义务。一些大学已经开发并采用了报告教学奖学金的机制。在本文中，我们将为学术领域的欠发达做出贡献，即整合和应用。我们首先将发现，教学，整合和应用的奖学金置于专业间和知识交流的辩论中。其次，我们提出了一种方法，供卫生科学学者报告与其他学科，决策者和社区进行整合和应用的奖学金的过程和结果。我们以师资，任期和晋升系统的结构和过程变化的建议作为结束，以使具有不同学术组合的卫生科学学者受到重视，并维持多种形式的学术奖学金。在知识的生产日益被视为社会合作活动的时代，至关重要的学术机构仍然具有现实意义。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号