• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Health Equity >The Harold Amos Medical Faculty Development Program: Evaluation of a National Program to Promote Faculty Diversity and Health Equity
【2h】

The Harold Amos Medical Faculty Development Program: Evaluation of a National Program to Promote Faculty Diversity and Health Equity

机译：哈罗德·阿莫斯（Harold Amos）医学教职员工发展计划：评估促进教职员工多元化和健康公平的国家计划

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务，本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文，但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁，仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况，如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

>Purpose: The Harold Amos Medical Faculty Development Program (AMFDP), a national program of the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation, seeks to support academic physicians from historically disadvantaged backgrounds and serves as a model program for promoting faculty diversity and health equity. Our objective was to determine differences in scientific productivity, promotions and retentions, and leadership attainment among faculty applicants to this national minority faculty development program.>Methods: Final-round interview applicants from 2003 to 2008 were selected. Differences in publications, grants, promotions/retentions, and leadership positions through 2013 were compared between funded scholars and unfunded nonscholars. Semistructured interviews were conducted to identify factors that facilitated and hindered academic success.>Results: A total of 124 applicants (76 scholars and 48 nonscholars) who participated in final-round interviews from 2003 to 2008 were eligible. Scholars and nonscholars had similar number of publications. Scholars had greater number of grants and grant dollars, but differences were not significant after accounting for AMFDP program awards. Scholars were more likely to hold leadership positions (28% vs. 10%, p=0.02), but equally likely to be promoted (67% vs. 58%, p=0.32) and retained (84% vs. 75%, p=0.21). In interviews, all participants endorsed mentoring, funding, and nonscientific education to academic success, but scholars reported greater availability of leadership opportunities consequent to AMFDP.>Conclusion: There were few differences in academic productivity attributable to a national faculty diversity program. However, program participants were more likely to endorse and attain leadership positions. Academic institutions should consider facilitating leadership development of minority faculty as a means of advancing health equity research and training.
机译：>目的：罗伯特·伍德·约翰逊基金会（Robert Wood Johnson Foundation）的国家计划-哈罗德·阿莫斯医学教师发展计划（AMFDP）旨在为具有历史弱势背景的学术医生提供支持，并作为促进教师多样性和发展的典范计划。健康公平。我们的目标是确定参加此少数民族教师发展计划的教师申请人在科学生产率，晋升和保留以及领导才能方面的差异。>方法：选择了2003年至2008年的最后一轮面试申请人。比较了受资助学者和无资助非学者的2013年出版物，赠款，晋升/保留和领导职位的差异。进行了半结构式访谈，以找出有助于和阻碍学术成就的因素。>结果：从2003年到2008年，总共有124名申请人（76名学者和48名非学者）符合条件。学者和非学者的出版物数量相近。学者拥有更多的助学金和助学金，但考虑到AMFDP计划的奖励，差异不大。学者更有可能担任领导职务（28％vs. 10％，p = 0.02），但同样有可能被提升（67％vs. 58％，p = 0.32）并被保留（84％vs. 75％，p）。 = 0.21）。在访谈中，所有参与者都认可了导师，资助和非科学教育以取得学术上的成功，但是学者们报告说，由于AMFDP而带来的领导机会的可用性更高。>结论：由于国家教职员工的学术生产力差异不大多元化计划。但是，计划参与者更有可能认可并担任领导职务。学术机构应考虑促进少数民族教师的领导力发展，以此作为促进健康平等研究和培训的手段。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号