• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>GMS Interdisciplinary Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery DGPW >Peer-assisted teaching student tutors as examiners in an orthopedic surgery OSCE station – pros and cons
【2h】

Peer-assisted teaching student tutors as examiners in an orthopedic surgery OSCE station – pros and cons

机译：在骨科手术OSCE站中由同伴协助的学生辅导员担任检查员–利弊

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务，本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文，但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁，仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况，如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

>Background: The OSCE (objective structured clinical examination) is composed of oral and practical examination in order to examine students’ abilities to imply clinical examination techniques and to interact with patients. The examiners for this procedure can be either lecturers or peers. The aim of this work is to evaluate the peer-assisted teaching student tutors as examiners in an orthopedic surgery OSCE station. >Methods: We analyzed the OSCE data from 2013 to 2015. During this period over 300 medical students were examined each year. An evaluation was conducted at an orthopedic station and examined by peer students to assess the advantages and disadvantages of peer-assisted teaching student tutors as examiners. >Results: We have noticed that student peers are more flexible regarding their schedule and they have been well trained for OSCE. Concerning the economic aspects, student peers are clearly of major economic advantage.Disadvantages were not reported in our study probably because peers were well trained and the checklists are monitored regularly. >Conclusion: Student peers in OSCE are of major advantage due to their flexible time schedule and relatively low costs. They must be well trained and the checklists are to be monitored regularly. Our study shows that peer tutor examiners conducted the examination as competent as lecture examiners. However, legal restrictions on the employment of students should be considered.
机译：>背景：OSCE（客观结构化临床考试）由口头考试和实践考试组成，目的是检查学生暗示临床检查技术以及与患者互动的能力。此过程的考官可以是讲师或同伴。这项工作的目的是评估骨科手术OSCE工作站中由同伴协助的教学学生导师作为检查员的情况。 >方法：我们分析了2013年至2015年的OSCE数据。在此期间，每年检查了300多名医学生。在骨科站进行了评估，并由同伴学生进行了检查，以评估同伴辅助教学学生导师作为考官的优缺点。 >结果：我们注意到，学生同龄人的日程安排更加灵活，他们已经接受过OSCE的良好培训。在经济方面，学生同龄人显然具有主要的经济优势。我们的研究没有报告缺点，这可能是因为同龄人受过良好的训练并且定期检查清单。 >结论：OSCE的学生同龄人由于其灵活的时间表和相对较低的成本而具有主要优势。必须对他们进行良好的培训，并定期检查清单。我们的研究表明，同行导师考官进行的考试与演讲考官一样胜任。但是，应考虑对学生就业的法律限制。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号