• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Journal of Microbiology Biology Education >Engaging in the Publication Process Improves Perceptions of Scientific Communication Critique and Career Skills Among Graduate Students
【2h】

Engaging in the Publication Process Improves Perceptions of Scientific Communication Critique and Career Skills Among Graduate Students

机译：参与出版过程可提高研究生对科学交流批判和职业技能的认识

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务，本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文，但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁，仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况，如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Reading and critiquing primary scientific literature is an important skill for graduate students, as reviewing literature is critical to advancing science. Prior research indicates that graduate students lack understanding of effective communication as well as basic experimental design, but also that graduate students are capable of growth in their experimental design abilities when given proper opportunities. The Journal of Emerging Investigators (JEI) provides graduate students with the opportunity to review and edit original research papers submitted by middle and high school student-authors. The purpose of this project was to determine whether participation in the primary literature process through JEI effectively aids in developing graduate students’ perceived abilities in the domains of communication, scientific critique, and career preparation. A 12-question survey was distributed using SurveyMonkey to 215 JEI reviewers and editors. Editors, whose role involves the synthesis of feedback from multiple reviewers and interaction with papers in their earliest stages, perceived that they benefited more than did reviewers in every domain assessed by the survey. Perceived impact on critiquing skills was only rated more highly by reviewers than by editors once the graduate students in question had reviewed 10 or more papers. The results of this research suggest that graduate students should participate early and often in the reading and reviewing of primary literature; furthermore, the study of flawed science writing can help to improve experimental design, critique, and science communication skills.
机译：阅读和批判基础科学文献是研究生的一项重要技能，因为对文学进行评论对于推进科学至关重要。先前的研究表明，研究生缺乏对有效沟通和基本实验设计的理解，而且，只要有适当的机会，研究生就能提高他们的实验设计能力。新兴研究者杂志（JEI）为研究生提供了审查和编辑初中和高中学生作者提交的原创研究论文的机会。该项目的目的是确定通过JEI参与初级文学过程是否有效地帮助发展了研究生在交流，科学批判和职业准备等领域的感知能力。使用SurveyMonkey向215个JEI审阅者和编辑分发了12个问题的调查。编辑者的角色涉及综合多个审阅者的反馈意见，并在最早的阶段就与论文进行互动。他们认为，在调查所评估的每个领域中，他们比审阅者受益更多。一旦有问题的研究生审阅了10篇或10篇以上的论文，评论者对评论技巧的影响才比编辑者给予更高的评价。这项研究的结果表明，研究生应及早并经常参与初级文献的阅读和复习。此外，对有缺陷的科学写作的研究可以帮助提高实验设计，批判和科学交流技能。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号