首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Systematic Reviews >Use of programme theory to understand the differential effects of interventions across socio-economic groups in systematic reviews—a systematic methodology review

【2h】

Use of programme theory to understand the differential effects of interventions across socio-economic groups in systematic reviews—a systematic methodology review

机译：运用程序理论来理解系统回顾中系统经济回顾对社会经济群体干预措施的不同影响-系统方法论回顾

代理获取

本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务，本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文，但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁，仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况，如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

页面导航

摘要
著录项
相似文献
相关主题

摘要

BackgroundSystematic review guidance recommends the use of programme theory to inform considerations of if and how healthcare interventions may work differently across socio-economic status (SES) groups. This study aimed to address the lack of detail on how reviewers operationalise this in practice.

机译：背景技术系统评价指南建议使用程序理论来指导有关保健干预措施是否以及如何在社会经济地位（SES）群体中发挥不同作用的考虑。这项研究旨在解决审稿人如何在实践中实现这一点的细节。

著录项

期刊名称 Systematic Reviews
作者
Michelle Maden; Alex Cunliffe; Naoimh McMahon; Andrew Booth; Gina Michelle Carey; Suzy Paisley; Rumona Dickson; Mark Gabbay;
展开▼
作者单位

展开▼
年(卷),期 2017(6),-1
年度 2017
页码 266
总页数 23
原文格式 PDF
正文语种
中图分类
关键词
Systematic review Equity Methodology Theory Programme theory;

机译：系统评价;公平;方法论;理论;程序论;

相似文献

外文文献
中文文献
专利

1. Use of programme theory to understand the differential effects of interventions across socio-economic groups in systematic reviews—a systematic methodology review [J] . Michelle Maden, Alex Cunliffe, Naoimh McMahon, Systematic Reviews . 2017,第1期

机译：运用程序理论在系统评价中了解整个社会经济群体的干预措施的不同影响-系统方法论评价
2. Answer to the Letter to the Editor of F. M. Kovacs et al. entitled "overviews should meet the methodological standards of systematic reviews" concerning "the evidence on surgical interventions for low back disorders, an overview of systematic reviews" by Wilco C.H. Jacobs et al.; Eur Spine J, doi:10.1007/s00586-013-2823-4 [J] . JacobsW.C.H., RubinsteinS.M., WillemsP.C., European spine journal: official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society . 2014,第2期

机译：F. M. Kovacs等人给编辑的信的答复。 Wilco C.H.的题为“综述应符合系统评价的方法学标准”，涉及“下腰部疾病的外科手术证据，系统评价的概述”。 Jacobs等。 Eur Spine J，doi：10.1007 / s00586-013-2823-4
3. Answer to the Letter to the Editor of F. M. Kovacs et al. entitled "overviews should meet the methodological standards of systematic reviews" concerning "the evidence on surgical interventions for low back disorders, an overview of systematic reviews" by Wilco C.H. Jacobs et al.; Eur Spine J, doi:10.1007/s00586-013-2823-4 [J] . JacobsW.C.H., RubinsteinS.M., WillemsP.C., European spine journal: official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society . 2014,第2期

机译：回答致意案的编辑。Kovacs等人。题为“概述应符合系统性评论的方法论标准”关于“低背障碍的手术干预措施的证据，威尔科C.H.的系统性评论概述” 雅各布等人。 EUR SPINE J，DOI：10.1007 / S00586-013-2823-4
4. Interventions for Reducing Ambient Air Pollution and Their Effects on Health: Final Results from a Cochrane Systematic Review [C] . Jake Burns, Hanna Boogaard, Lisa Pfadenhauer, Joint annual meeting of the International Society of Exposure Science and the International Society for Environmental Epidemiology . 2018

机译：减少环境空气污染的干预措施及其对健康的影响：Cochrane系统评价的最终结果
5. Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses on Effects of Ayurvedic Interventions for Hypercholesterolemia, Hypertension, and Coronary Heart Disease [D] . Gyawali, Dinesh. 2017

机译：阿育吠陀干预对高胆固醇血症，高血压和冠心病的影响的系统评价和荟萃分析
6. A critical appraisal of the methodology and quality of evidence of systematic reviews and meta-analyses of traditional Chinese medical nursing interventions: a systematic review of reviews [O] . Ying-Hui Jin, Guo-Hao Wang, Yi-Rong Sun, 2016

机译：对中医护理干预的系统评价和荟萃分析的方法和证据质量的严格评估：对评价的系统评价
7. Use of programme theory to understand the differential effects of interventions across socio-economic groups in systematic reviews-a systematic methodology review. [O] . Maden, M, Cunliffe, A, McMahon, N, 2017

机译：运用程序理论来理解系统评价（系统方法论评价）中各个社会经济群体的干预措施的不同影响。

Use of programme theory to understand the differential effects of interventions across socio-economic groups in systematic reviews—a systematic methodology review

摘要

著录项

相似文献

相关主题

期刊订阅