首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Tobacco Control >Moving East: how the transnational tobacco industry gained entry to the emerging markets of the former Soviet Union—part II: an overview of priorities and tactics used to establish a manufacturing presence
【2h】

Moving East: how the transnational tobacco industry gained entry to the emerging markets of the former Soviet Union—part II: an overview of priorities and tactics used to establish a manufacturing presence

机译:向东移动:跨国烟草业如何进入前苏联的新兴市场-第二部分:建立生产据点的优先重点和策略概述

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

>Objectives: To explore how British American Tobacco (BAT), having established cigarette imports, responded to the opportunities for investment in cigarette manufacturing in the former Soviet Union (FSU). >Design: Analysis of documents held at the BAT archive in Guildford, UK. >Results: Considerable priority was attached to investing in the FSU. This led BAT to undertake a major organisational change and to intense competition to acquire assets. BAT used flawed economic arguments to persuade cash starved governments that its investment would reap economic rewards. It offered excise advice that disadvantaged governments while benefiting BAT, confused issues over pricing, and avoided competitive tendering. BAT targeted agriculture ministries, using its expertise in leaf production to differentiate itself from other potential investors. It subverted the principles of corporate social responsibility to promote itself as a business partner. BAT's task was made easier by the naivety of post-Soviet governments and by the international financial organisations' support for rapid economic reform. The latter permitted tobacco transnationals to penetrate markets before effective competitive tendering processes had been established, giving them the opportunity to minimise prices and establish monopolies. >Conclusions: Many of the arguments employed when penetrating post-Soviet markets were highly misleading but governments lacked expertise to realise this. There is a need to build tobacco control capacity in transition economies, within and outside government, to ensure that governments are better informed of the true economic and health impacts of tobacco. Rapid transition from socialist to market economies without establishing regulatory institutional structures may be dangerous when investing companies use business practices that fall short of international standards.
机译:>目标:探讨已经建立卷烟进口的英美烟草公司(BAT)如何应对前苏联(FSU)的卷烟制造投资机会。 >设计:分析位于英国吉尔福德的BAT档案中保存的文档。 >结果:在FSU中进行投资具有相当的优先权。这导致英美烟草公司进行了重大的组织变革,并进行了激烈的竞争以获取资产。英美烟草公司使用有缺陷的经济论据说服现金匮乏的政府,认为其投资将获得经济回报。它提供的消费税建议在使BAT受益的同时使政府处于不利地位,使定价上的问题困惑,并避免了竞争性招标。英美烟草公司以农业部门为目标,利用其在烟叶生产方面的专业知识将自己与其他潜在投资者区分开。它颠覆了企业社会责任的原则,以提升自己作为商业伙伴的地位。后苏联政府的天真和国际金融组织对快速经济改革的支持使英美烟草的任务变得更加容易。后者允许烟草跨国公司在建立有效的竞争性招标程序之前进入市场,从而为他们提供了将价格降至最低并建立垄断的机会。 >结论:在渗透后苏联市场时所采用的许多论点极具误导性,但政府缺乏专门知识来实现​​这一点。有必要在政府内部和外部的转型经济体中建立烟草控制能力,以确保使政府更好地了解烟草的真实经济和健康影响。当投资公司使用的业务实践不符合国际标准时,如果不建立监管机构结构而从社会主义迅速过渡到市场经济可能会很危险。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号