• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Journal of Rural Medicine : JRM >Vegetable intake frequency is higher among the rural than among the urban orsuburban residents and is partially related to vegetable cultivation receiving andpurchasing at farmers’ markets: A cross-sectional study in a city within GunmaJapan
【2h】

Vegetable intake frequency is higher among the rural than among the urban orsuburban residents and is partially related to vegetable cultivation receiving andpurchasing at farmers’ markets: A cross-sectional study in a city within GunmaJapan

机译：农村地区的蔬菜摄入频率高于城市地区或城市地区郊区居民部分与蔬菜种植接收和在农贸市场购买商品：在群马市内的一个城市进行的横断面研究日本

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务，本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文，但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁，仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况，如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

>Objectives: This study aimed at identifying the differences in the vegetable intake frequency among rural, suburban, and urban residents. It also intended to estimate the effects of vegetable cultivation, receiving vegetables, and purchasing vegetables at farmers’ markets on the differences in vegetable intake frequency. Based on the results, to promote vegetable intake, we discuss the value of supporting vegetable cultivation in the rural areas.>Materials and Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional study targeting residents aged between 20 and 74, living in three parts of a city within the Gunma prefecture in Japan. The three locations were selected to represent the rural, suburban, and urban areas. We mailed two sets of anonymous self-administered questionnaires to all households in the three areas (a total of 2,260 households, comprising about 1,000 people aged between 20 and 74 in each area). The survey requested information on the vegetable intake frequency, vegetable cultivation, frequency of receiving vegetables, frequency of vegetable purchase at farmers’ markets, the subjective difficulty in food-store access, economic circumstances, health attitudes, and demographic characteristics. We used the analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) to examine the data obtained.>Results: We received 873 responses (from 586 households), of which 90 were irrelevant, thus leaving a sample of 783 residents (257 rural, 259 suburban, 267 urban) available for statistical analysis. The results revealed that the rural residents hadsignificantly greater vegetable intake frequency than the urban and suburban residentsdid. These regional differences became smaller after the adjustment of the followingvariables: vegetable cultivation, receiving vegetables, and vegetable purchase at farmers’markets. No significant difference was observed in the vegetable intake frequency betweenthe rural and urban respondents after this adjustment was made.>Conclusions: Vegetable intake frequency was higher in the rural area than inthe suburban and urban areas. Vegetable cultivation, receiving vegetables, and vegetablepurchase at farmers’ markets were strongly linked to these regional differences.
机译：>目标：本研究旨在确定农村，郊区和城市居民蔬菜摄入频率的差异。它还打算估计蔬菜种植，接受蔬菜以及在农贸市场购买蔬菜对蔬菜摄入频率差异的影响。根据结果​​，为提高蔬菜摄入量，我们讨论了在农村地区支持蔬菜种植的价值。>材料和方法：我们针对20至74岁，在日本群马县的一个城市的三个地方。选择了三个位置代表农村，郊区和城市地区。我们向这三个地区的所有家庭（共计2260户家庭，每个地区约1000人，年龄在20至74岁之间）邮寄了两组匿名的自我管理调查表。调查要求提供以下信息：蔬菜摄入频率，蔬菜种植，蔬菜接收频率，在农贸市场购买蔬菜的频率，进入食品店的主观难度，经济状况，健康态度和人口统计学特征。我们使用协方差分析（ANCOVA）来检验所获得的数据。>结果：我们收到了873份响应（来自586户家庭），其中90份是不相关的，因此留下了783名居民（257名农村居民）的样本。 ，259个郊区，267个城市）进行统计分析。结果表明，农村居民有蔬菜摄入频率明显高于城市和郊区居民做到了。经过以下调整，这些地区差异变小了变量：蔬菜种植，接受蔬菜和在农民手中购买蔬菜市场。之间的蔬菜摄入频率之间没有观察到显着差异做出调整后的农村和城市受访者。>结论：农村地区的蔬菜摄入频率高于农村地区。郊区和城市地区。蔬菜栽培，收蔬菜和蔬菜在农贸市场的购买与这些地区差异密切相关。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
代理获取

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号