• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>The Canadian Veterinary Journal >L’euthanasie de convenance des animaux de compagnie : portrait du dilemme au sein de la profession vétérinaire québécoise
【2h】

L’euthanasie de convenance des animaux de compagnie : portrait du dilemme au sein de la profession vétérinaire québécoise

机译：宠物安乐死为方便起见：魁北克兽医行业内的困境画像

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务，本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文，但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁，仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况，如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

>Convenience euthanasia in companion animals: Dilemma among veterinarians in Quebec. Many veterinarians working in the field of companion animal medicine have to deal with requests for convenience euthanasia in their practices. As it is the case in other medical fields, veterinarians are trained to treat their patients. It is thus easy to understand that veterinarians consider convenience euthanasia as one of the most difficult ethical dilemmas they have to deal with in their practice. Regulatory boundaries concerning the practice of euthanasia are limited to the method use to induce the death of the animal but do not give any indication as to what should be the proper circumstances surrounding the request. To date, there are few articles on this matter and the perspective of veterinarians on the subject was rarely addressed. This article reports results obtained following a study conducted upon Québec’s veterinarians on the topic of convenience euthanasia. The data was obtained via an online survey created by the research team to evaluate the perspective of veterinarians on the topic, how they perceived consequences of convenience euthanasia and what were the solutions they would take into consideration in order to help the profession on resolving their dilemma. The data collected sheds light on the existing duality between double allegiance regarding the duties emerging from the relation with the patient (animal) and the client (pet owner) veterinarian are facing in their daily practice. On one hand veterinarians recognized that ‘convenience euthanasia’ is contrary to animal welfare. On the other hand they also recognized the pet owner’s right to ask for ‘convenience euthanasia’ when he can no longer care for its pet.(Translated by Dr. Rathwell-Deault)
机译：>伴侣动物的安乐死：魁北克兽医的困境。许多从事伴侣动物医学领域的兽医必须在实践中处理对便利安乐死的要求。与其他医学领域一样，兽医也接受过治疗患者的培训。因此，很容易理解，兽医将便利安乐死视为他们在实践中必须处理的最困难的道德困境之一。关于实施安乐死的监管范围仅限于用于诱导动物死亡的方法，但并未给出有关该要求的适当情况的任何指示。迄今为止，关于此问题的文章很少，很少涉及兽医对这个问题的看法。本文报告了对魁北克兽医进行的关于安乐死便利性主题的研究结果。数据是通过研究团队创建的在线调查获得的，该调查旨在评估兽医对该主题的看法，他们如何看待安乐死的后果以及为帮助该行业解决困境而考虑的解决方案是什么？ 。收集到的数据揭示了双重效忠之间在与患者（动物）和委托人（宠物主人）兽医之间的关系中出现的职责之间存在的双重性，兽医在日常实践中正面临这些职责。一方面，兽医认识到“安乐死”与动物福利相反。另一方面，他们也承认宠物主人在不再照顾宠物时有权要求“安乐死”。（Rathwell-Deault博士翻译）

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号