首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>BMC Medical Research Methodology >A critical analysis of test-retest reliability in instrument validation studies of cancer patients under palliative care: a systematic review

【2h】

A critical analysis of test-retest reliability in instrument validation studies of cancer patients under palliative care: a systematic review

机译：姑息治疗下癌症患者仪器验证研究中重测信度的关键分析：系统综述

代理获取

本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务，本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文，但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁，仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况，如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

页面导航

摘要
著录项
相似文献
相关主题

摘要

BackgroundPatient-reported outcome validation needs to achieve validity and reliability standards. Among reliability analysis parameters, test-retest reliability is an important psychometric property. Retested patients must be in a clinically stable condition. This is particularly problematic in palliative care (PC) settings because advanced cancer patients are prone to a faster rate of clinical deterioration. The aim of this study was to evaluate the methods by which multi-symptom and health-related qualities of life (HRQoL) based on patient-reported outcomes (PROs) have been validated in oncological PC settings with regards to test-retest reliability.

机译：背景患者报告的结果验证需要达到有效性和可靠性标准。在可靠性分析参数中，重测可靠性是一项重要的心理计量属性。重新测试的患者必须处于临床稳定状态。这在姑息治疗（PC）的环境中尤其成问题，因为晚期癌症患者容易出现较快的临床恶化率。这项研究的目的是评估已在肿瘤PC设置中验证基于患者报告结果（PROs）的多症状和健康相关生活质量（HRQoL）的方法，以进行重测信度。

著录项

期刊名称 BMC Medical Research Methodology
作者
Carlos Eduardo Paiva; Eliane Marçon Barroso; Estela Cristina Carneseca; Cristiano de Pádua Souza; Felipe Thomé dos Santos; Rossana Verónica Mendoza López; Sakamoto Bianca Ribeiro Paiva;
展开▼
作者单位

展开▼
年(卷),期 2014(14),-1
年度 2014
页码 8
总页数 10
原文格式 PDF
正文语种
中图分类医院、综合医院;中医院;
关键词
Validation studies Test-retest reliability Systematic review Cancer Palliative care;

机译：验证研究;重测信度;系统评价;癌症;姑息治疗;

相似文献

外文文献
中文文献
专利

1. A critical analysis of test-retest reliability in instrument validation studies of cancer patients under palliative care: a systematic review [J] . Carlos E Paiva, Eliane M Barroso, Estela C Carneseca, BMC Medical Research Methodology . 2014,第1期

机译：姑息治疗下癌症患者仪器验证研究中重测信度的关键分析：系统综述
2. Palliative care symptom assessment for patients with cancer in the emergency department: validation of the Screen for Palliative and End-of-life care needs in the Emergency Department instrument. [J] . Richards CT, Gisondi MA, Chang CH, Journal of palliative medicine . 2011,第6期

机译：急诊科对癌症患者的姑息治疗症状评估：在急诊科仪器中验证了姑息治疗和临终护理需求筛查。
3. A First Step in the Development of an International Self-Report Instrument for Physical Functioning in Palliative Cancer Care: A Systematic Literature Review and an Expert Opinion Evaluation Study [J] . Journal of pain and symptom management. . 2009,第2期

机译：开发国际姑息治疗中身体机能自我报告工具的第一步：系统文献综述和专家意见评估研究
4. mHealth in palliative care for cancer patients care givers [C] . Newton Andebe, Peter Waiganjo, John Weru IST-Africa Week Conference . 2017

机译：癌症患者和护理人员的姑息治疗中的mHealth
5. The Institute of Medicine's 2001 report on palliative cancer care as an instrument of innovation in palliative oncology [D] . Hanson, Christopher S. 2007

机译：医学研究所在2001年的报告中将姑息癌症治疗作为姑息肿瘤学创新工具
6. Palliative Care Symptom Assessment for Patients with Cancer in the Emergency Department: Validation of the Screen for Palliative and End-of-Life Care Needs in the Emergency Department Instrument [O] . Christopher T. Richards, Michael A. Gisondi, Chih-Hung Chang, -1

机译：急诊科癌症患者的姑息治疗症状评估：急诊科仪器对姑息和临终护理需求筛查的验证
7. A critical analysis of test-retest reliability in instrument validation studies of cancer patients under palliative care: a systematic review [O] . Carlos Eduardo Paiva, Eliane Marçon Barroso, Estela Cristina Carneseca, 2014

机译：姑息治疗下癌症患者仪器验证研究中重测信度的关键分析：系统综述

A critical analysis of test-retest reliability in instrument validation studies of cancer patients under palliative care: a systematic review

摘要

著录项

相似文献

相关主题

期刊订阅