首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making >Time-to-event versus ten-year-absolute-risk in cardiovascular risk prevention – does it make a difference? Results from the Optimizing-Risk-Communication (OptRisk) randomized-controlled trial
【2h】

Time-to-event versus ten-year-absolute-risk in cardiovascular risk prevention – does it make a difference? Results from the Optimizing-Risk-Communication (OptRisk) randomized-controlled trial

机译:在心血管疾病风险预防中事件发生时间和绝对绝对风险相比有10年–这有区别吗?优化风险交流(OptRisk)随机对照试验的结果

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

BackgroundThe concept of shared-decision-making is a well-established approach to increase the participation of patients in medical decisions. Using lifetime risk or time-to-event (TTE) formats has been increasingly suggested as they might have advantages, e.g. in younger patients, to better show consequences of unhealthy behaviour. In this study, the most-popular ten-year risk illustration in the decision-aid-software arribaTM (emoticons), is compared within a randomised trial to a new-developed TTE illustration, which is based on a Markov model.
机译:背景技术共同决策的概念是一种完善的方法,可以增加患者对医疗决策的参与度。越来越多地建议使用生命周期风险或事件发生时间(TTE)格式,因为它们可能具有优势,例如在年轻患者中,以更好地显示不良行为的后果。在这项研究中,在一项随机试验中,将决策辅助软件arriba TM (表情符号)中最受欢迎的十年风险插图与新开发的TTE插图进行了比较。在马尔可夫模型上

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号