首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>AMIA Annual Symposium Proceedings >Classifying Clinical Trial Eligibility Criteria to Facilitate Phased Cohort Identification Using Clinical Data Repositories
【2h】

Classifying Clinical Trial Eligibility Criteria to Facilitate Phased Cohort Identification Using Clinical Data Repositories

机译:使用临床数据存储库对临床试验资格标准进行分类以促进阶段性队列识别

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

A major challenge in using electronic health record repositories for research is the difficulty matching subject eligibility criteria to query capabilities of the repositories. We propose categories for study criteria corresponding to the effort needed for querying those criteria: “easy” (supporting automated queries), mixed (initial automated querying with manual review), “hard” (fully manual record review), and “impossible” or “point of enrollment” (not typically in health repositories). We obtained a sample of 292 criteria from 20 studies from ClinicalTrials.gov. Six independent reviewers, three each from two academic research institutions, rated criteria according to our four types. We observed high interrater reliability both within and between institutions. The analysis demonstrated typical features of criteria that map with varying levels of difficulty to repositories. We propose using these features to improve enrollment workflow through more standardized study criteria, self-service repository queries, and analyst-mediated retrievals.
机译:使用电子病历存储库进行研究的主要挑战是难以将受试者资格标准与存储库的查询能力进行匹配。我们为研究标准提出了与查询这些标准所需的工作相对应的类别:“简单”(支持自动查询),混合(初始自动查询和手动审阅),“硬”(完全手动记录审阅)和“不可能”或“注册点”(通常不在健康资料库中)。我们从ClinicalTrials.gov的20项研究中获得了292条标准的样本。六名独立审稿人,分别来自两个学术研究机构的三名,根据我们的四种类型对标准进行了评分。我们观察到机构内部和机构之间的高度可靠性。分析显示了标准的典型特征,这些标准以不同的难度级别映射到存储库。我们建议使用这些功能,通过更标准化的学习标准,自助式存储库查询和分析师介导的检索来改善注册工作流程。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号