首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Gut >The causes of obvious jaundice in South West Wales: perceptions versus reality
【2h】

The causes of obvious jaundice in South West Wales: perceptions versus reality

机译:西南威尔士明显黄疸的成因:感知与现实

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

AIMS—(1) A prospective analysis of clinically obvious jaundice (bilirubin >120 µmol/l) in South Wales to determine accuracy of diagnosis, referral pattern, treatment, and outcome. (2) To compare British gastroenterologists' and local general practitioners' perceptions of common causes of jaundice with our study findings.
METHODS—Over a seven month period all patients with bilirubin >120 µmol/l (excluding neonates with physiological jaundice) were identified by a biochemistry laboratory serving three general hospitals and the community. Clinical data were recorded prospectively. Sixty nine consultant gastroenterologists and 67 local general practitioners (GPs) were asked to cite the commonest causes of bilirubin >120 µmol/l in their experience.
RESULTS—A total of 121 patients were identified of whom 95 were admitted to hospital because of jaundice, 22 developed jaundice while in hospital, and four remained in the community. Causes of jaundice were: malignancy 42, sepsis/shock 27, cirrhosis 25, gall stones 16, drugs 7, autoimmune hepatitis 2, and viral hepatitis 2. One in five was wrongly diagnosed, often as viral hepatitis. Although 30% were under surgical care only 4% required surgery. Overall mortality was high (31%) and greatest in sepsis/shock (51%). Gastroenterologists and GPs both perceived malignancy and gall stones to be the commonest causes of marked jaundice followed by viral hepatitis and cirrhosis; sepsis/shock was hardly mentioned.
CONCLUSIONS—There are important discrepancies between gastroenterologists' and GPs' perceptions of likely causes of jaundice and the actual causes we have shown. In particular, sepsis/shock is common in hospital practice but is overlooked whereas viral hepatitis is rare but perceived as common and overdiagnosed. Gall stones usually cause mild jaundice with bilirubin levels less than 120 µmol/l. Many patients are referred to surgical services for historical reasons yet rarely require surgery and are usually treated by physicians or endoscopists.


>Keywords: jaundice; bilirubin; sepsis; hepatitis; gall stones; questionnaire
机译:目的—(1)对南威尔士州临床上明显的黄疸病(胆红素> 120 µmol / l)进行前瞻性分析,以确定诊断,转诊方式,治疗和结局的准确性。 (2)将英国胃肠病医生和当地全科医生对黄疸的常见原因的看法与我们的研究结果进行比较。
方法-在七个月的时间里,所有胆红素> 120μmol/ l的患者(不包括患有生理性黄疸的新生儿)是由为三所综合医院和社区服务的生化实验室确定的。前瞻性记录临床数据。要求六十九位胃肠病学顾问医师和67位当地全科医生列出其经验中最常见的胆红素> 120μmol/ l原因。结果-总共鉴定出121位患者,其中95位入院由于黄疸,住院期间有22例患了黄疸,仍有4例留在社区。黄疸的原因是:恶性肿瘤42,败血症/休克27,肝硬化25,胆结石16,药物7,自身免疫性肝炎2和病毒性肝炎2。五分之一的人被误诊为病毒性肝炎。尽管30%接受外科手术治疗,但只有4%需要手术治疗。总死亡率很高(31%),败血症/休克最高(51%)。胃肠病学家和全科医生都认为恶性肿瘤和胆结石是引起黄疸,病毒性肝炎和肝硬化的最常见原因。几乎没有提到败血症/休克。
结论—胃肠病医生和全科医生对黄疸的可能原因与我们所显示的实际原因之间的认识存在重大差异。特别地,败血症/休克在医院实践中很普遍,但是却被忽视,而病毒性肝炎很少见,但被认为是普遍且被过度诊断。胆结石通常会引起轻度黄疸,胆红素水平低于120 µmol / l。许多患者因历史原因而接受外科手术,但很少需要手术,通常由医师或内镜医师治疗。


>关键词:黄疸胆红素败血症肝炎;胆结石;问卷调查

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号