首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America >Detection and rate discrimination of amplitude modulation in electrical hearing
【2h】

Detection and rate discrimination of amplitude modulation in electrical hearing

机译:电听力中调幅的检测和速率判别

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Three experiments were designed to examine temporal envelope processing by cochlear implant (CI) listeners. In experiment 1, the hypothesis that listeners’ modulation sensitivity would in part determine their ability to discriminate between temporal modulation rates was examined. Temporal modulation transfer functions (TMTFs) obtained in an amplitude modulation detection (AMD) task were compared to threshold functions obtained in an amplitude modulation rate discrimination (AMRD) task. Statistically significant nonlinear correlations were observed between the two measures. In experiment 2, results of loudness-balancing showed small increases in the loudness of modulated over unmodulated stimuli beyond a modulation depth of 16%. Results of experiment 3 indicated small but statistically significant effects of level-roving on the overall gain of the TMTF, but no impact of level-roving on the average shape of the TMTF across subjects. This suggested that level-roving simply increased the task difficulty for most listeners, but did not indicate increased use of intensity cues under more challenging conditions. Data obtained with one subject, however, suggested that the most sensitive listeners may derive some benefit from intensity cues in these tasks. Overall, results indicated that intensity cues did not play an important role in temporal envelope processing by the average CI listener.
机译:设计了三个实验来检查人工耳蜗(CI)听众对颞包膜的处理。在实验1中,检验了以下假设:听众的调制灵敏度将部分决定他们区分时间调制率的能力。将在幅度调制检测(AMD)任务中获得的时间调制传递函数(TMTF)与在幅度调制速率鉴别(AMRD)任务中获得的阈值函数进行了比较。两种方法之间观察到统计学上显着的非线性相关性。在实验2中,响度平衡的结果显示,超过16%的调制深度,调制后的响度相对于未调制刺激的响度有小幅提高。实验3的结果表明,水平粗纱对TMTF的总体增益影响很小,但在统计学上却具有统计学意义,但水平粗纱对受试者的TMTF平均形状没有影响。这表明,水平漫游只是增加了大多数听众的任务难度,但并未表明在更具挑战性的条件下增加了强度提示的使用。然而,从一个主题获得的数据表明,最敏感的听众可能会从这些任务中的强度提示中受益。总体而言,结果表明,强度提示在普通CI收听者的时间包络处理中没有发挥重要作用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号