首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. American Volume >Results from the International Consortium of Orthopaedic Registries: An Innovative Distributed Research Network for Global Post-Market Surveillance: International Comparative Evaluation of Knee Replacement with Fixed or Mobile Non-Posterior-Stabilized Implants
【2h】

Results from the International Consortium of Orthopaedic Registries: An Innovative Distributed Research Network for Global Post-Market Surveillance: International Comparative Evaluation of Knee Replacement with Fixed or Mobile Non-Posterior-Stabilized Implants

机译:国际骨科注册机构联合会的结果:针对全球上市后监测的创新型分布式研究网络:采用固定式或移动式非后路稳定植入物置换膝关节的国际比较评估

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Background:Mobile-bearing total knee prostheses were designed to reduce wear and improve implant survivorship following total knee arthroplasty. However, the benefit of mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasty remains unproven. Both mobile-bearing and fixed-bearing total knee arthroplasty implants are available in posterior-stabilized and non-posterior-stabilized designs. With the latter, the implant does not recreate the function of the posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) with a posterior-stabilizing cam mechanism. The purpose of the present study was to compare mobile-bearing, non-posterior-stabilized devices with fixed-bearing, non-posterior-stabilized devices used in total knee arthroplasty through a novel multinational study design.
机译:背景:可移动的全膝关节假体旨在减少全膝关节置换术后的磨损并提高植入物的存活率。然而,可移动的全膝关节置换术的益处尚未得到证实。可移动支撑和固定支撑全膝关节置换植入物均采用后稳定和非后稳定设计。对于后者,植入物不能通过后稳定凸轮机构来重建后十字韧带(PCL)的功能。本研究的目的是通过新颖的多国研究设计,比较用于全膝关节置换术的可移动支撑的非后稳定装置与固定支撑的非后稳定装置。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号