首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Journal of Human Kinetics >Test-Retest Reliability of Measurements of the Center of Pressure Displacement in Quiet Standing and During Maximal Voluntary Body Leaning Among Healthy Elderly Men
【2h】

Test-Retest Reliability of Measurements of the Center of Pressure Displacement in Quiet Standing and During Maximal Voluntary Body Leaning Among Healthy Elderly Men

机译:健康老年人中安静站立时和最大自愿身体倾斜过程中压力位移中心的测量值的重新测试可靠性

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The aim of the study was to evaluate intra- and intersession test-retest reliability for the measurements of centre of pressure displacement in quiet standing and during maximal voluntary body leaning (approximate area of stability limits).27 elderly men participated in the study (71.4±4.9 of age). Intrasession (4 measurements with two-minute breaks) and intersession (4 measurements one week apart) reliability were examined. Parameters connected to the centre of pressure data (AMTI force platform) were measured during a quiet stance and voluntary body leaning in medio-lateral and anterior-posterior directions (approximate limits of stability). Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC2,1 and ICC2,k) were calculated.In case of quiet standing, only mean velocity of centre of pressure sway provides high reliability in intrasession – ICC2,1 of .84 and ICC2,k of .96, and in intersession – ICC2,1 of .76. Evaluation of limits of stability showed high values of all parameters (maximal and minimal displacement in sagittal and frontal planes, distance between maximal and minimal position of centre of pressure in sagittal and frontal planes and approximated area of stability limits) in intrasession – ICC2,1 between .82 to .96 and ICC2,k between .95 to .99. Similar tendency was observed in the intersession retest.Average velocity of the centre of pressure is the only parameter that showed a high application value in case of measurements during quiet standing. Parameters related to the stability limits appeared very reliable what proves that this evaluation may have potential application in the clinical practice.
机译:该研究的目的是评估在闭会期间和闭会期间重测的信度,以测量安静站立时和最大自愿身体倾斜(稳定极限范围的近似值)期间的压力位移中心。27名老年男性参加了该研究(71.4) ±4.9岁)。检查了课间内(4次测量,休息两分钟)和课间内(4个测量,间隔一周)。在安静姿势和自愿身体倾斜于中外侧和前后方向(稳定度的近似极限)期间,测量与压力中心数据(AMTI力平台)相关的参数。计算了类别内的相关系数(ICC2,1和ICC2,k)。在安静站立的情况下,只有压力摆动中心的平均速度才能在闭会期间提供较高的可靠性– ICC2,1为0.84,ICC2,k为0.96,以及在闭会期间– ICC2,1 of .76。稳定性极限的评估显示术中所有参数的高值(矢状和额状面的最大和最小位移,矢状面和额状面的压力中心的最大和最小位置之间的距离以及稳定性极限的近似面积)– ICC2,1在.82至.96和ICC2之间,k在.95至.99之间。在闭会期间的重新测试中也观察到了类似的趋势。在静置状态下进行测量时,压力中心的平均速度是唯一显示出较高应用价值的参数。与稳定性极限有关的参数显得非常可靠,这证明了该评估在临床实践中可能具有潜在的应用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号