首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Frontiers in Psychiatry >Who Establishes the Presence of a Mental Disorder in Defendants? Medicolegal Considerations on a European Court of Human Rights Case
【2h】

Who Establishes the Presence of a Mental Disorder in Defendants? Medicolegal Considerations on a European Court of Human Rights Case

机译:谁在被告中确立精神障碍的存在?欧洲人权法院案的法医学考虑

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Legal insanity is a peculiar element of criminal law, because it brings together two very different disciplines: psychiatry and psychology on the one hand and the law on the other. One of the basic questions regarding evaluations of defendants concerns the question of who should establish “true mental disorder,” the judge or the behavioral expert? This question is complicated, and in this contribution it will be explored based on a Dutch case that was eventually decided by the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR). We will argue that the ECtHR provides a valuable legal framework. Based on its merits, the framework could also be of interest to countries outside the Court’s jurisdiction.
机译:法律上的精神错乱是刑法的一个特有元素,因为它把两种截然不同的学科融合在一起:一方面是精神病学和心理学,另一方面是法律。有关评估被告的基本问题之一是法官或行为专家应由谁来确定“真正的精神障碍”?这个问题很复杂,在此贡献中,将基于由欧洲人权法院(ECtHR)最终裁定的荷兰案件进行探讨。我们将争辩说ECtHR提供了有价值的法律框架。根据其优点,该框架也可能对法院管辖范围以外的国家感兴趣。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号