首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>other >The effects of rhythm control strategies versus rate control strategies for atrial fibrillation and atrial flutter: A systematic review with meta-analysis and Trial Sequential Analysis

【2h】

The effects of rhythm control strategies versus rate control strategies for atrial fibrillation and atrial flutter: A systematic review with meta-analysis and Trial Sequential Analysis

机译：心律控制策略与心率控制策略对房颤和房扑的影响：荟萃分析和试验序贯分析的系统综述

代理获取

本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务，本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文，但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁，仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况，如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

页面导航

摘要
著录项
相似文献
相关主题

摘要

BackgroundAtrial fibrillation and atrial flutter may be managed by either a rhythm control strategy or a rate control strategy but the evidence on the clinical effects of these two intervention strategies is unclear. Our objective was to assess the beneficial and harmful effects of rhythm control strategies versus rate control strategies for atrial fibrillation and atrial flutter.

机译：背景房颤和心房扑动可通过节律控制策略或心率控制策略来控制，但尚不清楚这两种干预策略的临床效果。我们的目标是评估心律控制策略与速率控制策略对房颤和心房扑动的有利和有害影响。

著录项

期刊名称 other
作者
Naqash J. Sethi; Joshua Feinberg; Emil E. Nielsen; Sanam Safi; Christian Gluud; Janus C. Jakobsen;
展开▼
作者单位

展开▼
年(卷),期 -1(12),10
年度 -1
页码 e0186856
总页数 28
原文格式 PDF
正文语种
中图分类
关键词

相似文献

外文文献
中文文献
专利

1. The effects of rhythm control strategies versus rate control strategies for atrial fibrillation and atrial flutter: a protocol for a systematic review with meta-analysis and Trial Sequential Analysis [J] . Naqash J. Sethi, Sanam Safi, Emil E. Nielsen, Systematic Reviews . 2017,第1期

机译：节奏控制策略与速率控制策略对房颤和心房扑动的影响：采用荟萃分析和试验序贯分析进行系统评价的方案
2. Comparison of the rhythm control treatment strategy versus the rate control strategy in patients with permanent or long-standing persistent atrial fibrillation and heart failure treated with cardiac resynchronization therapy - a pilot study of Cardiac Resynchronization in Atrial Fibrillation Trial (Pilot-CRAfT): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial [J] . Jan Ciszewski, Aleksander Maciag, Ilona Kowalik, Trials . 2014,第1期

机译：永久性或长期性持续性心房颤动和心力衰竭患者接受心脏再同步治疗的心律控制治疗策略与心率控制策略的比较-心房颤动试验中心脏再同步的先导研究（Pilot-CRAfT）：研究方案用于随机对照试验
3. Rate versus rhythm control in atrial fibrillation and clinical outcomes: Updated systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials [J] . CaldeiraD., DavidC., SampaioC. Archives of cardiovascular diseases . 2012,第4期

机译：心房纤颤的心率控制与心律控制及临床结局：随机对照试验的系统综述和荟萃分析
4. Effects of Computerized Guideline-Oriented Clinical Decision Support System on Antithrombotic Therapy in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis [C] . Ryota Sakurai, Kazuhiko Ohe MEDINFO . 2019

机译：面向计算机化指南临床决策支持系统对心房颤动患者抗血栓形成的影响：系统综述与荟萃分析
5. A Meta-Analysis on the Clinical Effectiveness of Cryoballoon Versus Radiofrequency Ablation in Patients With Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation [D] . Lam, Kai Kwan Jeff 2019

机译：阵发性心房颤动患者冷冻球囊与射频消融术临床疗效的Meta分析
6. The effects of rhythm control strategies versus rate control strategies for atrial fibrillation and atrial flutter: a protocol for a systematic review with meta-analysis and Trial Sequential Analysis [O] . Naqash J. Sethi, Sanam Safi, Emil E. Nielsen, 2017

机译：心律控制策略与心率控制策略对房颤和房扑的影响：一项荟萃分析和序贯分析的系统评价方案
7. The effects of rhythm control strategies versus rate control strategies for atrial fibrillation and atrial flutter: a protocol for a systematic review with meta-analysis and Trial Sequential Analysis [O] . Naqash J. Sethi, Sanam Safi, Emil E. Nielsen, 2017

机译：心律控制策略与心率控制策略对房颤和房扑的影响：一项荟萃分析和序贯分析的系统评价方案

The effects of rhythm control strategies versus rate control strategies for atrial fibrillation and atrial flutter: A systematic review with meta-analysis and Trial Sequential Analysis

摘要

著录项

相似文献

相关主题

期刊订阅