首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>other >Good and Bad Research Collaborations: Researchers’ Views on Science and Ethics in Global Health Research
【2h】

Good and Bad Research Collaborations: Researchers’ Views on Science and Ethics in Global Health Research

机译:好的和坏的研究合作:研究人员对全球卫生研究中科学与伦理的看法

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

There has been a dramatic rise in the scale and scope of collaborative global health research. A number of structural and scientific factors explain this growth and there has been much discussion of these in the literature. Little, if any, attention has been paid, however, to the factors identified by scientists and other research actors as important to successful research collaboration. This is surprising given that their decisions are likely to play a key role in the sustainability and effectiveness of global health research initiatives. In this paper, we report on qualitative research with leading scientists involved in major international research collaborations about their views on good and bad collaborations and the factors that inform their decision-making about joining and participating actively in research networks. We identify and discuss eight factors that researchers see as essential in judging the merits of active participation in global health research collaborations: opportunities for active involvement in cutting-edge, interesting science; effective leadership; competence of potential partners in and commitment to good scientific practice; capacity building; respect for the needs, interests and agendas of partners; opportunities for discussion and disagreement; trust and confidence; and, justice and fairness in collaboration. Our findings suggest that the sustainability and effectiveness of global health research collaborations has an important ethical or moral dimension for the research actors involved.
机译:全球合作卫生研究的规模和范围已经急剧增加。许多结构和科学因素可以解释这种增长,并且文献中对此进行了大量讨论。但是,科学家和其他研究参与者确定的对成功开展研究合作至关重要的因素很少,甚至没有引起注意。鉴于他们的决定可能在全球卫生研究计划的可持续性和有效性中发挥关键作用,这令人惊讶。在本文中,我们与参与大型国际研究合作的领先科学家进行了定性研究,以表述他们对良好和不良合作的看法,以及有助于其参与和积极参与研究网络的决策依据的因素。我们确定并讨论了八个因素,研究人员认为这些因素对于判断积极参与全球卫生研究合作的优劣至关重要:积极参与前沿,有趣的科学的机会;有效的领导;潜在合作伙伴的能力和对良好科学实践的承诺;能力建设;尊重合作伙伴的需求,利益和议程;讨论和分歧的机会;信任和信心;以及合作中的公正与公平。我们的研究结果表明,全球卫生研究合作的可持续性和有效性对于所涉研究参与者而言,在道德或道德方面具有重要意义。

著录项

  • 期刊名称 other
  • 作者单位
  • 年(卷),期 -1(11),10
  • 年度 -1
  • 页码 e0163579
  • 总页数 19
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号