• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>other >Methodological Issues in Examining Measurement Equivalence in Patient Reported Outcomes Measures: Methods Overview to the Two-Part Series Measurement Equivalence of the Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System® (PROMIS®) Short Forms
【2h】

Methodological Issues in Examining Measurement Equivalence in Patient Reported Outcomes Measures: Methods Overview to the Two-Part Series Measurement Equivalence of the Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System® (PROMIS®) Short Forms

机译：在检查患者报告的结果度量中的测量当量的方法学问题：两部分系列的方法概述患者报告的结果度量信息系统®（PROMIS®）简短形式的测量当量

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务，本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文，但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁，仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况，如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

The purpose of this article is to introduce the methods used and challenges confronted by the authors of this two-part series of articles describing the results of analyses of measurement equivalence of the short form scales from the Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System® (PROMIS®). Qualitative and quantitative approaches used to examine differential item functioning (DIF) are reviewed briefly. Qualitative methods focused on generation of DIF hypotheses. The basic quantitative approaches used all rely on a latent variable model, and examine parameters either derived directly from item response theory (IRT) or from structural equation models (SEM). A key methods focus of these articles is to describe state-of-the art approaches to examination of measurement equivalence in eight domains: physical health, pain, fatigue, sleep, depression, anxiety, cognition, and social function. These articles represent the first time that DIF has been examined systematically in the PROMIS short form measures, particularly among ethnically diverse groups. This is also the first set of analyses to examine the performance of PROMIS short forms in patients with cancer.Latent variable model state-of-the-art methods for examining measurement equivalence are introduced briefly in this paper to orient readers to the approaches adopted in this set of papers. Several methodological challenges underlying (DIF-free) anchor item selection and model assumption violations are presented as a backdrop for the articles in this two-part series on measurement equivalence of PROMIS measures.
机译：本文的目的是介绍由两部分组成的系列文章的作者所使用的方法和面临的挑战，这些文章描述了来自患者报告的结果测量信息系统®的短式量表的测量当量分析结果（PROMIS ®）。简要回顾了用于检查差异项功能（DIF）的定性和定量方法。定性方法侧重于DIF假设的生成。所使用的基本定量方法都依赖于潜在变量模型，并检查直接从项目响应理论（IRT）或结构方程模型（SEM）得出的参数。这些文章重点关注的方法是在八个领域中描述用于检查测量等效性的最新方法：身体健康，疼痛，疲劳，睡眠，抑郁，焦虑，认知和社交功能。这些文章是首次以PROMIS简短形式对DIF进行系统检查，尤其是在不同种族群体中。这也是检验PROMIS简写形式在癌症患者中的性能的第一套分析方法。本文简要介绍了潜在的可变模型最新的测量等效性检查方法，以使读者了解采用的方法。这套文件。在这个由两部分组成的关于PROMIS度量的等效性的系列文章中，提出了一些背景（无DIF）锚项选择和模型假设违背的方法挑战。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号