• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>other >Dissemination of Health-Related Research among Scientists in Three Countries: Access to Resources and Current Practices
【2h】

Dissemination of Health-Related Research among Scientists in Three Countries: Access to Resources and Current Practices

机译：在三个国家的科学家之间传播与健康有关的研究：获取资源和当前的做法

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务，本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文，但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁，仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况，如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Objectives. In public health and clinical settings insufficient dissemination of evidence-based practices limits the reach of new discoveries to broad populations. This study aimed to describe characteristics of the dissemination process by researchers across three countries (Brazil, United Kingdom, and United States), explore how designing for dissemination practices has been used, and analyze factors associated with dissemination. Methods. A similar online survey was used to query researchers across the three countries; data were pooled to draw cross-country conclusions. Findings. This study identified similarities and differences between countries. Importance of dissemination to nonresearcher audiences was widely recognized as important; however, traditional academic venues were the main dissemination method. Several factors were associated with self-rated dissemination effort in the pooled sample, but these predictive factors (e.g., support and resources for dissemination) had low prevalence. Less than one-third of researchers rated their level of effort for dissemination as excellent. Respondents reported limited support and resources to make it easier for researchers who might want to disseminate their findings. Conclusion. Though intentions show the importance of dissemination, researchers across countries lack supports to increase dissemination efforts. Additional resources and training in designing for dissemination along with improved partnerships could help bridge the research-practice gap.
机译：目标。在公共卫生和临床环境中，基于证据的实践的传播不足，限制了新发现对广大人群的普及。这项研究旨在描述三个国家（巴西，英国和美国）的研究人员的传播过程特征，探索如何使用传播实践设计，并分析与传播相关的因素。方法。类似的在线调查被用来查询三个国家的研究人员。汇总数据得出跨国结论。发现。这项研究确定了国家之间的异同。普遍认为，向非研究者受众传播是很重要的；然而，传统的学术场所是主要的传播方式。汇总样本中与自我评估的传播努力相关的因素有几个，但是这些预测因素（例如，传播的支持和资源）的流行率很低。不到三分之一的研究人员将他们的传播努力评为极佳。受访者报告说，他们的支持和资源有限，使想要传播其发现的研究人员更加容易。结论。尽管意图表明了传播的重要性，但各国研究人员缺乏增加传播努力的支持。在设计传播方面的额外资源和培训以及改善的伙伴关系可以帮助弥合研究与实践之间的差距。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号