• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>other >Old wine in new bottles: Tobacco industrys submission to European Commission tobacco product directive public consultation
【2h】

Old wine in new bottles: Tobacco industrys submission to European Commission tobacco product directive public consultation

机译：新瓶装旧葡萄酒：烟草业向欧盟委员会烟草制品指令的公开征询

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务，本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文，但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁，仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况，如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Between September and December 2010 the European Commission Health & Consumer Protection Directorate-General (DGSANCO) held a public consultation on a possible revision of the European Union Tobacco Products Directive (2001/37/EC). We used content analysis of the tobacco industry's and related parties' 300 submissions to the public consultation to determine if tobacco industry and its allies in Europe are prepared to reduce harm of the tobacco products as their public statements assert. The industry submission resorted to traditional tobacco industry arguments where illicit trade and freedom of choice were emphasized and misrepresented the conclusions of a DGSANCO-commissioned scientific report on smokeless tobacco products. Retailers and wholesalers referred to employment and economic growth more often than respondents from other categories. The pattern of responses in the submission differed dramatically from independent public opinion polls of EU citizens' support for tobacco control policies. None of the major tobacco manufacturers or their lobbying organizations supported any of the DGSANCO's proposed evidence based interventions (pictorial health warnings, plain packaging or point-of-sale display bans) to reduce harms caused by cigarette smoking.
机译：在2010年9月至2010年12月之间，欧洲委员会健康与消费者保护总局（DGSANCO）就欧盟烟草制品指令（2001/37 / EC）的可能修订版举行了公众咨询。我们使用了烟草业及相关方向公众咨询的300份呈件的内容分析，以确定烟草业及其在欧洲的盟友是否准备减少烟草制品的危害，正如其公开声明所断言的那样。该行业意见书诉诸于传统烟草业的论点，其中强调了非法贸易和选择自由，并曲解了由DGSANCO委托撰写的有关无烟烟草产品的科学报告的结论。零售商和批发商比其他类别的受访者更常提及就业和经济增长。呈件中的回应方式与对欧盟公民对烟草控制政策的支持的独立民意测验截然不同。大型烟草制造商或其游说组织都没有支持DGSANCO建议的任何基于证据的干预措施（图片健康警告，无装饰包装或销售点陈列禁令），以减少吸烟引起的危害。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号