首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>other >An Approach for Integrating the Prioritization of Functional and Nonfunctional Requirements
【2h】

An Approach for Integrating the Prioritization of Functional and Nonfunctional Requirements

机译:一种整合功能需求和非功能需求优先级的方法

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Due to the budgetary deadlines and time to market constraints, it is essential to prioritize software requirements. The outcome of requirements prioritization is an ordering of requirements which need to be considered first during the software development process. To achieve a high quality software system, both functional and nonfunctional requirements must be taken into consideration during the prioritization process. Although several requirements prioritization methods have been proposed so far, no particular method or approach is presented to consider both functional and nonfunctional requirements during the prioritization stage. In this paper, we propose an approach which aims to integrate the process of prioritizing functional and nonfunctional requirements. The outcome of applying the proposed approach produces two separate prioritized lists of functional and non-functional requirements. The effectiveness of the proposed approach has been evaluated through an empirical experiment aimed at comparing the approach with the two state-of-the-art-based approaches, analytic hierarchy process (AHP) and hybrid assessment method (HAM). Results show that our proposed approach outperforms AHP and HAM in terms of actual time-consumption while preserving the quality of the results obtained by our proposed approach at a high level of agreement in comparison with the results produced by the other two approaches.
机译:由于预算期限和上市时间的限制,对软件需求进行优先级排序至关重要。需求优先级排序的结果是需求的排序,在软件开发过程中首先需要考虑这些需求。为了获得高质量的软件系统,在优先级排序过程中必须同时考虑功能和非功能需求。尽管到目前为止已经提出了几种需求优先级排序方法,但是在优先级排序阶段,没有提出用于同时考虑功能性需求和非功能性需求的特定方法或方法。在本文中,我们提出了一种旨在整合对功能和非功能需求进行优先级排序的方法。应用提议的方法的结果将产生功能和非功能需求的两个单独的优先列表。已通过旨在将这种方法与两种基于最新技术的方法,层次分析法(AHP)和混合评估方法(HAM)进行比较的经验实验评估了该方法的有效性。结果表明,与其他两种方法产生的结果相比,在实际时间消耗方面,我们提出的方法优于AHP和HAM,同时在较高的一致性范围内保持了我们提出的方法获得的结果质量。

著录项

  • 期刊名称 other
  • 作者

    Mohammad Dabbagh; Sai Peck Lee;

  • 作者单位
  • 年(卷),期 -1(2014),-1
  • 年度 -1
  • 页码 737626
  • 总页数 13
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号