• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>other >I Publish in I Edit? - Do Editorial Board Members of Urologic Journals Preferentially Publish Their Own Scientific Work?
【2h】

I Publish in I Edit? - Do Editorial Board Members of Urologic Journals Preferentially Publish Their Own Scientific Work?

机译：我在编辑中发布吗？ -泌尿科期刊的编辑委员会成员是否优先发表自己的科学著作？

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务，本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文，但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁，仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况，如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Scientists who are members of an editorial board have been accused of preferentially publishing their scientific work in the journal where they serve as editor. Reputation and academic standing do depend on an uninterrupted flow of published scientific work and the question does arise as to whether publication mainly occurs in the self-edited journal. This investigation was designed to determine whether editorial board members of five urological journals were more likely to publish their research reports in their own rather than in other journals. A retrospective analysis was conducted for all original reports published from 2001–2010 by 65 editorial board members nominated to the boards of five impact leading urologic journals in 2006. Publications before editorial board membership, 2001–2005, and publications within the period of time as an editorial board member, 2006–2010, were identified. The impact factors of the journals were also recorded over the time period 2001–2010 to see whether a change in impact factor correlated with publication locality. In the five journals as a whole, scientific work was not preferentially published in the journal in which the scientists served as editor. However, significant heterogeneity among the journals was evident. One journal showed a significant increase in the amount of published papers in the ‘own’ journal after assumption of editorship, three journals showed no change and one journal showed a highly significant decrease in publishing in the ‘own’ journal after assumption of editorship.
机译：作为编辑委员会成员的科学家被指控在其担任编辑的杂志上优先发表其科研成果。名誉和学术地位确实取决于出版的科学工作的不间断流程，并且确实出现了有关出版是否主要出现在自编期刊中的问题。这项调查旨在确定五种泌尿科期刊的编辑委员会成员是否更有可能以自己的方式而不是其他期刊发表研究报告。回顾性分析了2006年由2006年提名5个影响力领先的泌尿科杂志的委员会的65名编辑委员会成员对2001-2010年发表的所有原始报告。在2001-2005年担任编辑委员会委员之前的出版物以及确定了2006-2010年的编辑委员会成员。还记录了2001-2010年期间期刊的影响因子，以查看影响因子的变化是否与出版地相关。在全部五个期刊中，科学工作没有优先发表在由科学家担任编辑的期刊上。但是，期刊之间存在明显的异质性。假设担任编辑后，一本期刊显示“本人”期刊中已发表论文的数量显着增加，三本期刊没有变化，而一本期刊显示在担任编辑后“本”期刊中的出版量显着减少。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号