• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>other >Are Chimpanzees Really So Poor at Understanding Imperative Pointing? Some New Data and an Alternative View of Canine and Ape Social Cognition
【2h】

Are Chimpanzees Really So Poor at Understanding Imperative Pointing? Some New Data and an Alternative View of Canine and Ape Social Cognition

机译：黑猩猩真的很难理解命令式指点吗？一些新数据以及对犬类和猿类社会认知的另一种看法

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务，本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文，但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁，仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况，如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

There is considerable interest in comparative research on different species’ abilities to respond to human communicative cues such as gaze and pointing. It has been reported that some canines perform significantly better than monkeys and apes on tasks requiring the comprehension of either declarative or imperative pointing and these differences have been attributed to domestication in dogs. Here we tested a sample of chimpanzees on a task requiring comprehension of an imperative request and show that, though there are considerable individual differences, the performance by the apes rival those reported in pet dogs. We suggest that small differences in methodology can have a pronounced influence on performance on these types of tasks. We further suggest that basic differences in subject sampling, subject recruitment and rearing experiences have resulted in a skewed representation of canine abilities compared to those of monkeys and apes.
机译：比较研究引起了人们对不同物种响应人类交流线索（例如凝视和指向）能力的兴趣。据报道，某些犬在需要理解陈述性或命令性指点的任务上的表现明显优于猴类和猿类，并且这些差异归因于犬的驯化。在这里，我们在需要理解命令性要求的任务上测试了黑猩猩的样本，结果表明，尽管个体之间存在很大差异，但猿猴的表现与宠物狗中的猿猴相媲美。我们建议，方法上的细微差异可能会对这些类型任务的性能产生明显影响。我们进一步建议，与猴子和猿类动物相比，受试者采样，受试者募集和饲养经验方面的基本差异导致犬科动物能力的偏斜表示。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号