首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>other >Client Incentives versus Contracting and Staff Incentives: How Care Continuity Interventions in Substance Abuse Treatment can improve Residential to Outpatient Transition
【2h】

Client Incentives versus Contracting and Staff Incentives: How Care Continuity Interventions in Substance Abuse Treatment can improve Residential to Outpatient Transition

机译:客户奖励与合同和员工激励措施:物质滥用治疗中的连续性干预措施如何改善住宅到门诊过渡

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Interventions for improving transition from short-term residential to outpatient treatment were examined. Usual care (UC; N = 114) was referral to a preferred outpatient program with advance appointment optional. Client Incentive (CI; N = 97) offered up to $100 in gift cards for intake and attendance during the first 30 days of treatment. Contracting with staff incentives (CSI; N = 49) consisted of meeting with an outpatient counselor prior to residential discharge, signing an attendance contract, receiving an appointment and payment to staff if clients attended. CSI significantly improved rates of successful transition (84%) and admission (74%) compared to UC (64% contact; 49% admitted). CI did not result in significantly improved outcomes (74%; 60%). CSI was likely mediated by the reliability (92% vs 52% in UC) and immediacy (1.0 vs 3.9 days) of appointment scheduling. This study supports use of CSI for improving rates of transition between residential and outpatient continuing care treatment.
机译:审查了改善从短期住院到门诊治疗过渡的干预措施。通常护理(UC; N = 114)转诊至首选门诊计划,并且可以选择提前预约。客户奖励计划(CI; N = 97)在治疗的前30天内提供高达$ 100的礼品卡用于入场和出诊。签订员工奖励计划(CSI; N = 49)包括在出院前与门诊顾问会面,签订出勤合同,接受任命并向客户付款(如果客户参加)。与UC(64%接触; 49%入院)相比,CSI显着提高了成功过渡(84%)和入院(74%)的比率。 CI并未显着改善预后(74%; 60%)。 CSI可能受约会安排的可靠性(92%vs UC中52%)和即时性(1.0 vs 3.9天)影响。这项研究支持使用CSI改善住院和门诊持续护理治疗之间的过渡率。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号