首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>other >Is it Logical to Count on Quantifiers? Dissociable Neural Networks Underlying Numerical and Logical Quantifiers
【2h】

Is it Logical to Count on Quantifiers? Dissociable Neural Networks Underlying Numerical and Logical Quantifiers

机译:依靠量词是否合乎逻辑?数值和逻辑量词基础的可分解神经网络

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The present study examined the neural substrate of two classes of quantifiers: Numerical quantifiers like “at least three” which require magnitude processing, and logical quantifiers like “some” which can be satisfied using a simple form of perceptual logic. We assessed these distinct classes of quantifiers with converging observations from two sources: functional imaging data from healthy adults, and behavioral and structural data from patients with corticobasal degeneration, who have acalculia. Our findings are consistent with the claim that numerical quantifier comprehension depends on a parietal-dorsolateral prefrontal network, but logical quantifier comprehension depends instead on a rostral medial prefrontal-posterior cingulate network. These observations emphasize the important contribution of abstract number knowledge to the meaning of numerical quantifiers in semantic memory and the potential role of a logic-based evaluation in the service of non-numerical quantifiers.
机译:本研究研究了两类量词的神经底物:需要量级处理的数字量词(如“至少三个”)和可以使用简单形式的感知逻辑满足的逻辑量词(如“ some”)。我们使用来自两个来源的聚合观测值评估了这些不同类别的量词:来自健康成年人的功能成像数据,以及来自无骨皮质变性患者的行为和结构数据。我们的发现与数字量词理解依赖于顶-背侧前额叶网络的主张相符,而逻辑量词理解则依赖于延髓内侧前额叶-后扣带网络。这些观察强调了抽象数字知识对语义记忆中数字量词的意义的重要贡献,以及基于逻辑的评估在非数字量词服务中的潜在作用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号