首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Global Health Action >What can we learn from studying control arms of randomised VAW prevention intervention evaluations: reflections on expected measurement error meaningful change and the utility of RCTs

【2h】

What can we learn from studying control arms of randomised VAW prevention intervention evaluations: reflections on expected measurement error meaningful change and the utility of RCTs

机译：我们可以通过研究随机的VAW预防干预评估的控制手段中学到什么：对预期测量误差有意义的变化和RCT的实用性的思考

代理获取

本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务，本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文，但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁，仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况，如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

页面导航

摘要
著录项
相似文献
相关主题

摘要

: Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) are a gold standard for evaluations in public health, economics and social sciences, including prevention of violence against women (VAW). They substantially reduce bias, but do not eliminate measurement error. Control arms often show change, but this is rarely systematically examined.

机译：：随机对照试验（RCT）是评估公共卫生，经济学和社会科学（包括预防对妇女的暴力行为（VAW））的金标准。它们可以大大减少偏差，但不能消除测量误差。控制臂经常显示出变化，但这很少被系统地检查。

著录项

期刊名称 Global Health Action
作者
Rachel Jewkes; Andrew Gibbs; Esnat Chirwa; Kristin Dunkle;
展开▼
作者单位

展开▼
年(卷),期 2020(13),1
年度 2020
页码 -1
总页数 12
原文格式 PDF
正文语种
中图分类
关键词
Randomised controlled trials; non-differential misclassification; proportionate change; sample size; gender-based violence; violence against women; bias; regression towards the mean;

机译：随机对照试验;无差别错误分类;相称变化;样本量;基于性别的暴力;对妇女的暴力行为;偏见;均值回归;

相似文献

外文文献
中文文献

1. Innovative cardiovascular primary prevention population-based strategies: a 2-year hybrid type 1 implementation randomised control trial (RCT) which evaluates behavioural change conducted by community champions compared with brief advice only from the SPICES project (scaling-up packages of interventions for cardiovascular disease prevention in selected sites in Europe and sub-Saharan Africa) [J] . Le Goff Delphine, Barais Marie, Perraud Gabriel, BMC Public Health . 2021,第1期

机译：创新的心血管初级预防人口策略：一个2年的混合型1实施随机控制试验（RCT），评估社区冠军进行的行为变化，而仅从香料项目（用于心血管疾病的缩放包装的缩放包）相比在欧洲和撒哈拉非洲的选定地点预防）
2. Description and process evaluation of pharmacists' interventions in a pharmacist-led information technology-enabled multicentre cluster randomised controlled trial for reducing medication errors in general practice (PINCER trial) [J] . HowardR., RodgersS., AveryA.J., The International journal of pharmacy practice . 2014,第1期

机译：在以药剂师为主导的信息技术支持的多中心集群随机对照试验中减少药剂师在一般实践中的用药错误的药剂师的干预措施的描述和过程评估（PINCER试验）
3. A multifactorial intervention for the prevention of falls in psychogeriatric nursing home patients, a randomised controlled trial (RCT). [J] . Neyens JC, Dijcks BP, Twisk J, Age and Ageing: The Journal of the British Geriatrics Society and the British Society for Research on Ageing . 2009,第2期

机译：一项用于预防老年精神病院患者跌倒的多因素干预措施，一项随机对照试验（RCT）。
4. Process Evaluation of a Cluster Randomised Controlled Trial of a Monitoring and Feedback Tool Embedded in a Counselling Protocol to Stimulate Physical Activity Study protocol procesevaluation RCT It's LiFe! [C] . Renee Verwey, Huibert Tange, Trudy van der Weijden, International Conference on eHealth, Telemedicine, and Social Medicine . 2015

机译：流程评估群组随机对照试验的监测和反馈工具中嵌入咨询协议，刺激体育活动研究协议Procesevalization RCT的生命！
5. Innovative cardiovascular primary prevention population-based strategies: a 2-year hybrid type 1 implementation randomised control trial (RCT) which evaluates behavioural change conducted by community champions compared with brief advice only from the SPICES project (scaling-up packages of interventions for cardiovascular disease prevention in selected sites in Europe and sub-Saharan Africa) [O] . Delphine Le Goff, Marie Barais, Gabriel Perraud, 2021

机译：创新的心血管初级预防人口策略：2年的混合型1实施随机调控试验（RCT）其评估社区冠军进行的行为变化与仅来自香料项目的简短建议（用于心血管疾病的干预措施的缩放包装欧洲和撒哈拉以南非洲选定地点预防）
6. What can we learn from studying control arms of randomised VAW prevention intervention evaluations: reflections on expected measurement error, meaningful change and the utility of RCTs [O] . Rachel Jewkes, Andrew Gibbs, Esnat Chirwa, 2020

机译：我们可以从学习随机虚拟性防止干预评估的控制臂中学习什么：对预期测量误差的反思，有意义的变化和RCT的效用

What can we learn from studying control arms of randomised VAW prevention intervention evaluations: reflections on expected measurement error meaningful change and the utility of RCTs

摘要

著录项

相似文献

相关主题

期刊订阅