• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Heliyon >The validation of a new scoring method for assessing ego development based on three dimensions of language
【2h】

The validation of a new scoring method for assessing ego development based on three dimensions of language

机译：一种基于语言三个维度的自我发展评估新评分方法的验证

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务，本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文，但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁，仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况，如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

We describe research on the validity of a new theoretical framework and scoring methodology, called STAGES, for sentence completion tests of meaning-making maturity or complexity (also called ego development or perspective-taking capacity). STAGES builds upon research on the substantially validated Washington University Sentence Completion Test of Jane Loevinger as updated by Susanne Cook-Greuter. STAGES proposes an underlying structural explanation for the Cook-Greuter system based on three dimensions. Two of these are polar factors: individual/collective, and passive/active; and the third is a categorization of the sophistication of the types of objects referred to (i.e. as concrete, subtle/abstract, or "metaware"). We describe two validation studies for the STAGES scoring method and model. The first is a replication study of concurrent validity, using 73 inventories to test the hypothesis that the STAGES scoring method replicates the Cook-Greuter scoring method. Using the weighted Kappa statistic, we demonstrate a very strong match between the two methods, confirming the first hypothesis. This study includes levels up to and including Strategist (i.e. a substantial percentage of test-takers from most populations). Levels above Strategist were validated using another method because (1) there is less Cook-Greuter data available at these levels, and (2) the two scoring methods diverge sufficiently, making comparison difficult. The second study, of 71 inventories, attempts to validate the STAGES scoring method at levels above Strategist by testing the inter-rater reliability among four scorers. The inter-rater reliability above Strategist, using the weighted Kappa statistic, was found to be moderate to substantial, indicating that the instrument and scoring method has internal validity for these four, rare higher levels. Additionally, the inter-rater reliability over all STAGES levels were found to be very strong.
机译：我们描述了一种新的理论框架和计分方法（称为STAGES）的有效性的研究，该方法适用于意义成熟度或复杂性（也称为自我发展或观点采摘能力）的句子完成测试。 STAGES建立在对Susanne Cook-Greuter更新的，经过充分验证的Jane Loevinger华盛顿大学句子完成测验的研究的基础上。 STAGES基于三个维度为Cook-Greuter系统提出了基本的结构解释。其中两个是极性因素：个人/集体，被动/主动；第三是所涉及对象类型（即具体的，微妙的/抽象的或“元感知的”）的复杂程度的分类。我们描述了两个对STAGES评分方法和模型的验证研究。第一个是对并发有效性的复制研究，使用73个清单来检验STAGES评分方法与Cook-Greuter评分方法重复的假设。使用加权Kappa统计量，我们证明了这两种方法之间的非常强的匹配，从而确认了第一个假设。这项研究包括的策略师包括策略师（即大多数人群中相当一部分的应试者）。使用另一种方法验证了高于Strategist的水平，这是因为（1）在这些水平上可获得的Cook-Greuter数据较少，并且（2）两种评分方法差异很大，使得比较变得困难。第二项研究涉及71个清单，试图通过测试四个评分者之间的评分者间信度，以高于Strategist的水平验证STAGES评分方法。使用加权Kapp统计量，发现高于Strategist的评分员之间信度为中度到严重，这表明该工具和评分方法对这四个罕见的较高水平具有内部有效性。此外，发现在所有STAGES级别上的评分者间可靠性非常强。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号