• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health >Assessing the Performance of Land Consolidation Projects in Different Modes: A Case Study in Jianghan Plain of Hubei Province China
【2h】

Assessing the Performance of Land Consolidation Projects in Different Modes: A Case Study in Jianghan Plain of Hubei Province China

机译：不同模式土地整理项目绩效评估-以湖北省江汉平原为例

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务，本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文，但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁，仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况，如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Land consolidation is essential in China for improving land use efficiency and supporting rural public space governance. Previously, the implementation of land consolidation projects (LCPs) had been mainly led by governments in China. In recent years, the Chinese government vigorously promoted land consolidation, and land consolidation in the corporation-leading mode (CLM) has emerged. This study focused on investigating the performance of CLM projects and the difference in performance levels between the CLM projects and the government-leading mode (GLM) projects. Based on the improved extensible matter–element model, the performance levels of 14 LCPs in GLM and CLM of Jianghan Plain, Hubei Province and related impact factors were analyzed. A set of evaluation indices was selected based on the “process-based thinking and logic”. Results showed that: (1) performance levels of the 14 LCPs are different, most of the projects in the GLM have ordinary or poor performance, while most of the projects in the CLM have excellent or good performance; (2) factors affecting the performance levels of LCPs are also different in the two modes. The main influencing factors in the CLM were the poor access to field roads, insufficient shelterbelt planting, and low land reclamation efficiency, while the insufficient shelterbelt planting, low annual output value of farmland and grain production capacity, low increase rate of agricultural labor production, and low land reclamation efficiency were the main influencing factors in the GLM; (3) comparative analysis of the two modes revealed that LCPs in the CLM have clear investment directions, high output benefits, and obvious advantages in the development of modern agriculture when compared with the GLM. To achieve improving the performance levels of LCPs, policy makers should actively innovate the implementation mode of LCPs and encourage all kinds of agricultural corporations to participate in land consolidation.
机译：在中国，土地整理对于提高土地利用效率和支持农村公共空间治理至关重要。以前，土地整理项目（LCP）的实施主要由中国政府牵头。近年来，中国政府大力推动土地整理，并出现了以公司主导模式（CLM）进行土地整理。这项研究的重点是调查CLM项目的绩效以及CLM项目与政府主导模式（GLM）项目之间的绩效水平差异。基于改进的可扩展物元模型，分析了湖北省江汉平原的GLM和CLM中14个LCP的性能水平以及相关的影响因素。根据“基于过程的思维和逻辑”选择了一组评估指标。结果表明：（1）14个LCP的绩效水平有所不同，GLM中的大多数项目的绩效为普通或较差，而CLM中的大多数项目的绩效为优良或良好； （2）在两种模式下，影响LCP性能水平的因素也有所不同。 CLM的主要影响因素包括：通行道路不畅，防护林种植不足和土地开垦效率低；防护林种植不足，农田的年产值和谷物生产能力低，农业劳动力生产增长率低，土地复垦效率低是主要的影响因素。 （3）两种模式的比较分析表明，与GLM相比，CLM中的LCP具有明确的投资方向，高产出效益以及在发展现代农业方面的明显优势。为了提高LCP的绩效水平，决策者应积极创新LCP的实施模式，并鼓励各种农业公司参与土地整理。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号