• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health >Providing Access to Urban Green Spaces: A Participatory Benefit-Cost Analysis in Spain
【2h】

Providing Access to Urban Green Spaces: A Participatory Benefit-Cost Analysis in Spain

机译：提供进入城市绿地的通道：西班牙的参与式收益成本分析

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务，本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文，但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁，仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况，如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

The opening up of green spaces could provide significant benefits to society. This study develops a framework to assess the economic benefits and costs of public interventions providing citizen access to urban green spaces. The Thinking Fadura project in Getxo (Spain) was used as a case study. A method for participatory benefit-cost analysis is developed, where a stakeholder-participatory evaluation is combined with a standard cost-benefit analysis. The participatory evaluation followed a bottom-up approach in a sequential evaluation including three main focal points: key stakeholders and experts, visitors and the general public. The assessment demonstrates that the Thinking Fadura project’s benefits outweigh the costs. The results suggest that projects designed with the purpose of improving green space accessibility to the general public can be beneficial from a societal perspective. The highest economic benefits were an increase in the amenity and recreational value and an increase in people’s physical activity. The participatory evaluation indicates that giving access to people of lower socio-economic status and vulnerable groups and improving recreational use were perceived as the most beneficial. An increase in noise, dirt, and risk of criminal activities as well as potential conflicts between green space users were perceived as the most negative impacts of opening a previously restricted area to the general public. The economic assessment of Thinking Fadura project could serve as a model in the decision-making process in locations where the use of greenspaces is restricted.
机译：开放绿色空间可以为社会带来重大利益。这项研究建立了一个框架，以评估公共干预措施的经济效益和成本，这些干预措施为公民提供了进入城市绿地的通道。西班牙格乔的Thinking Fadura项目被用作案例研究。开发了一种参与式利益成本分析方法，其中利益相关者参与式评估与标准成本效益分析相结合。参与式评估遵循自下而上的方法，进行了顺序评估，包括三个主要重点：主要利益相关者和专家，访客和公众。评估表明，Thinking Fadura项目的收益大于成本。结果表明，从社会的角度出发，旨在提高公众对绿色空间的可及性而设计的项目可能是有益的。经济效益最高的是舒适度和娱乐价值的增加以及人们体育锻炼的增加。参与性评价表明，使社会经济地位较低的人群和弱势群体获得机会并改善娱乐利用被认为是最有益的。噪声，污垢和犯罪活动的风险的增加以及绿色空间用户之间的潜在冲突被认为是向公众开放先前限制的区域带来的最大负面影响。 Think Fadura项目的经济评估可以作为在限制使用绿色空间的地区决策过程中的模型。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号