• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Elsevier Public Health Emergency Collection >Labouring geography: Negotiating scales strategies and future directions
【2h】

Labouring geography: Negotiating scales strategies and future directions

机译：地理地理：谈判规模策略和未来方向

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务，本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文，但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁，仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况，如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

In our editorial introduction to this themed issue on labour geography, we outline some important on-going debates in the relatively young field of labour geography and suggest future directions for research. First, there is the key question of labour as an active agent in the production of economic landscapes. The agency of labour will likely remain a defining feature of labour geography, but perhaps it is not as important to construct theoretical analytical boundaries as it is to define labour geography as a . Second, debates continue surrounding the production of scale and the multiscalarity of organized labour. Third, labour geographers have yet to engage in any sustained fashion with unpacking the complex identities of workers and the way in which those identities simultaneously are shaped by and shape the economic and cultural landscape. Fourth, there is some debate on the costs and benefits of a ‘normative’ labour geography which emphasizes what workers and their organizations ‘could’ or even ‘should’ do. Lastly, we challenge the assumption that labour geographers have not yet asserted themselves as activists in their own right. We conclude the editorial by introducing the articles included in the issue. While these articles may not address every gap in the literature, they do contribute in significant ways to move the labour geography project forward.
机译：在我们对劳动地理这一主题的社论介绍中，我们概述了相对较年轻的劳动地理领域中正在进行的一些重要辩论，并提出了未来的研究方向。首先，存在一个关键问题，即劳动力在经济形势的生产中作为积极的推动者。劳动代理机构可能仍将是劳动地理学的定义特征，但也许构建理论分析边界并不像将劳动地理学定义为劳动地理学那样重要。第二，围绕规模生产和有组织劳动的多尺度性的辩论仍在继续。第三，劳工地理学家还没有采取任何持续的方式来揭露工人的复杂身份，以及这些身份同时受到经济和文化格局的塑造和影响。第四，关于“规范”劳动地理的成本和收益存在一些争论，其中强调了工人及其组织“应该”甚至“应该”做什么。最后，我们对劳动地理学家尚未自称是活动家的假设提出质疑。通过介绍本期文章，我们结束了社论。尽管这些文章可能无法解决文献中的所有空白，但它们确实以显着方式做出了贡献，推动了劳动地理学项目的发展。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号