首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health >Smokers’ and Nonsmokers’ Receptivity to Smoke-Free Policies and Pro- and Anti-Policy Messaging in Armenia and Georgia
【2h】

Smokers’ and Nonsmokers’ Receptivity to Smoke-Free Policies and Pro- and Anti-Policy Messaging in Armenia and Georgia

机译:吸烟者和非吸烟者的接受性对无烟政策和反政策在亚美尼亚和格鲁吉亚的反政策消息

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Garnering support for smoke-free policies is critical for their successful adoption, particularly in countries with high smoking prevalence, such as Armenia and Georgia. In 2018, we surveyed 1456 residents (ages 18–64) of 28 cities in Armenia ( = 705) and Georgia ( = 751). We examined support for cigarette and electronic nicotine delivery systems (ENDS)/heated tobacco product (HTP) smoke-free policies in various locations and persuasiveness of pro- and anti-policy messaging. Participants were an average age of 43.35, 60.5% female, and 27.3% current smokers. Nonsmokers versus smokers indicated greater policy support for cigarette and ENDS/HTP and greater persuasiveness of pro-policy messaging. Armenians versus Georgians generally perceived pro- and anti-policy messaging more persuasive. In multilevel linear regression, sociodemographics (e.g., female) and tobacco use characteristics (e.g., smoking less frequently, higher quitting importance) correlated with more policy support. Greatest policy support was for healthcare, religious, government, and workplace settings; public transport; schools; and vehicles carrying children. Least policy support was for bar/restaurant outdoor areas. The most compelling pro-policy message focused on the right to clean air; the most compelling anti-policy message focused on using nonsmoking sections. Specific settings may present challenges for advancing smoke-free policies. Messaging focusing on individual rights to clean air and health may garner support.
机译:对无烟政策的支持支持对于他们的成功采用至关重要,特别是在患有高吸烟率的国家,如亚美尼亚和格鲁吉亚。 2018年,我们在亚美尼亚(= 705)和格鲁吉亚(= 751)的28个城市调查了1456年居民(年龄18-64岁)。我们检查了对卷烟和电子尼古丁交付系统(末端)/加热的烟草产品(HTP)无烟政策的支持,并在各个地点和有说服力的助手和反政策消息。参与者的平均年龄为43.35,女性60.5%和27.3%的吸烟者。 NonsMokers与吸烟者表示更大的政策支持,对烟和结束/ HTP和更高的亲政策消息的说服力。亚美尼亚人与格鲁吉亚人一般被认为是亲和力的反政策更多有说服力的。在多级线性回归,社会主干(例如,女性)和烟草使用特征(例如,吸烟不太频繁,戒烟重要性)与更多的政策支持相关。最大的政策支持是为医疗保健,宗教,政府和工作场所设置;公共交通;学校;和携带儿童的车辆。最少的政策支持是酒吧/餐厅户外区域。最引人注目的专业政策信息集中在右侧清洁空气;最引人注目的反政策消息,专注于使用非墨镜部分。特定的设置可能对推进无烟政策的挑战。焦点对个人权利的消息,清洁空气和健康可能会支持。

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号