首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Animals : an Open Access Journal from MDPI >Moral Convictions and Meat Consumption—A Comparative Study of the Animal Ethics Orientations of Consumers of Pork in Denmark Germany and Sweden
【2h】

Moral Convictions and Meat Consumption—A Comparative Study of the Animal Ethics Orientations of Consumers of Pork in Denmark Germany and Sweden

机译:道德定罪与肉类消费 - 丹麦猪肉消费者动物伦理取向的比较研究德国和瑞典

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

In western Europe, national animal welfare legislation since the 1980s in combination with EU legislation has served to ensure minimal requirements for the welfare of farm animals. For many consumers, however, these requirements do not go far enough. Market-driven initiatives where farmers, processors of animal products, and retailers raise the standards via labelling schemes and price premiums may further improve the welfare of farm animals, but such initiatives are only viable solutions if there is sufficient consumer support. To find out to what extent such support exists, we studied the relationship between animal ethics orientations and consumer demand for welfare-enhanced pork in Denmark, Germany, and Sweden. In all three countries, we identified a consumer segment that endorses the ideal behind schemes to enhance farm animal welfare, i.e., that it is ethically justified to eat meat provided the animals enjoy a good level of welfare. Consumers in this segment are highly concerned about animal welfare, and also purchase welfare pork more often than other consumers. More than one fourth of consumers in all three countries belong to this segment; therefore, we believe that market actors can be reassured that there will be persistent consumer demand for welfare-enhanced meat.
机译:在西欧,自20世纪80年代与欧盟立法相结合以来的国家动物福利立法旨在确保农场福利的最低要求。然而,对于许多消费者来说,这些要求不够远。市场驱动的举措,农民,动物产品的处理器和零售商通过标签计划提高标准和价格保费可能进一步改善农场动物的福利,但如果有足够的消费者支持,这些举措是可行的解决方案。为了了解此类支持的程度,我们研究了丹麦,德国和瑞典福利增强猪肉之间的动物伦理方向与消费者需求的关系。在所有三个国家,我们确定了一个消费者细分市场,以赞同提升农场动物福利的方案的理想,即,在良好的福利水平良好的福利水平良好的福利中,它是道德上的。这一部门的消费者非常关注动物福利,也比其他消费者更频繁地购买福利猪肉。所有三个国家的超过四分之一的消费者属于这一细分;因此,我们相信市场演员可以放心,将有持久的消费者对福利增强的肉类需求。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号