• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Animals : an Open Access Journal from MDPI >The Educational Efficacy of Humane Teaching Methods: A Systematic Review of the Evidence
【2h】

The Educational Efficacy of Humane Teaching Methods: A Systematic Review of the Evidence

机译：人文教学方法的教育疗效：对证据的系统审查

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务，本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文，但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁，仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况，如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Despite the fact that there are currently many humane teaching methods available, harmful animal use in education and training remains widespread among life and health sciences disciplines. The use of humane teaching methods instead is based not only on legal, ethical, and economic factors, but also on evidence that these training techniques are just as efficient or even better in improving knowledge, understanding, and clinical or surgical skills proficiency among students. However, studies systematically comparing the learning outcomes of both harmful animal use and humane teaching methods are more than a decade old, and the evidence needs to be updated. Here, we assess and summarize the currently available studies through the process of a systematic review. We found 50 relevant studies and established that in 90% of studies humane teaching methods were as or more effective than harmful animal use in achieving desired learning outcomes. These results are clear—there is no valid educational reason for continued harmful animal use in education and training.
机译：尽管目前有许多人的教学方法可用，但在教育和培训方面的有害动物使用仍然普遍存在的生活和健康科学学科。使用人文教学方法不仅基于法律，道德和经济因素，还基于这些培训技术与提高学生的知识，理解和临床或外科技能熟练程度高效甚至更好。然而，系统地比较有害动物使用和人道教学方法的学习结果的研究超过十年，并且需要更新证据。在这里，我们通过系统审查的过程评估和总结当前可用的研究。我们发现50项相关研究，并确定了90％的研究人道教学方法比有害动物在实现所需的学习成果方面都有或更有效。这些结果是明确的 - 没有有效的教育原因在教育和培训方面持续存在有害的动物。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号