首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>BMJ Open >SIZE study: study protocol of a multicentre randomised controlled trial to compare the effectiveness of an interarcuair decompression versus extended decompression in patients with intermittent neurogenic claudication caused by lumbar spinal stenosis
【2h】

SIZE study: study protocol of a multicentre randomised controlled trial to compare the effectiveness of an interarcuair decompression versus extended decompression in patients with intermittent neurogenic claudication caused by lumbar spinal stenosis

机译:尺寸研究:多期形随机对照试验的研究方案用于比较腰椎脊柱狭窄引起的间歇性神经源性跛行患者的间歇性解压缩与延长减压的延长减压

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Intermittent neurogenic claudication (INC) is often caused by lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS). Laminectomy is considered a frequently used surgical technique for LSS. Previous studies have shown that laminectomy can potentially cause lumbar instability. Less invasive techniques, preserving midline structures including the bilateral small size interarcuair decompression, are currently applied. Due to lack of evidence and consensus, surgeons have to rely on their training and own experiences to choose the best surgical techniques for their patients. Hence, an observer and patient blinded multicentre, randomised controlled trial was designed to determine the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of bilateral interarcuair decompression versus laminectomy for LSS.
机译:间歇性神经源性跛行(INC)通常由腰椎狭窄(LSS)引起。椎体切除术被认为是LSS的常用手术技术。以前的研究表明,椎板切除术可能导致腰部不稳定性。目前申请较少的侵入式技术,保存包括双侧小尺寸的中线结构,包括双侧小尺寸的切换减压。由于缺乏证据和共识,外科医生必须依靠他们的培训和自己的经验,为患者选择最佳的手术技巧。因此,观察者和患者致盲的多期体,随机对照试验旨在确定双侧间隔切压对LSS的叠层切除术的有效性和成本效益。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号