首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Contemporary Clinical Trials Communications >Comparing quality of life and postoperative pain after limited access and conventional aortic valve replacement: Design and rationale of the LImited access aortic valve replacement (LIAR) trial
【2h】

Comparing quality of life and postoperative pain after limited access and conventional aortic valve replacement: Design and rationale of the LImited access aortic valve replacement (LIAR) trial

机译:比较有限通道和常规主动脉瓣膜置换后的生活质量和术后疼痛:有限通道主动脉瓣更换(骗子)试验的设计和理论

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) via limited access approaches (‘mini-AVR’) have proven to be safe alternative for the surgical treatment of aortic valve disease. However, it remains unclear whether these less invasive approaches are associated with improved quality of life and/or reduced postoperative pain when compared to conventional SAVR via full median sternotomy (FMS).
机译:通过有限的接入方法(“迷你AVR”)的外科主动脉瓣更换(SAVR)已被证明是安全替代主动脉瓣病的手术治疗。然而,它仍然尚不清楚这些较少的侵入方法是否与通过全中位数术(FMS)相比,这些侵入性方法与常规萨尔群相比,这些侵入性方法是改善的寿命和/或术后疼痛。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号