首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Innovation in Aging >Who Benefits in Vitality After Retirement? Findings From a 3-Year Panel Study
【2h】

Who Benefits in Vitality After Retirement? Findings From a 3-Year Panel Study

机译:谁在退休后的活力益处?来自3年的小组学习的调查结果

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Background. Past studies have revealed the effect of retirement on various health measures. None, however, have studied retirement’s effect on vitality, a holistic measure of physical and mental health. To boot, very few studies have addressed the heterogeneity in the health consequences of retirement. This study investigates the effect of retirement on vitality, and how this effect is influenced by 1) manual work and 2) baseline vitality. Methods. The analyses were based on two waves of the NIDI Pension Panel Survey, collected in the Netherlands in 2015 and 2018. Data from 4,156 older workers (N=4,156), of whom 1,934 (46.5%) retired between waves, were analysed. Vitality is assessed in three ways, as: 1) a composite measure of vitality, and its sub-components 2) energy and 3) fatigue. Results. Conditional Change OLS Regression Models demonstrate that retirement improves vitality and decreases fatigue. These effects were heterogeneous. Retirement was more advantageous for older workers who experienced poor vitality and increased fatigue before retirement. Likewise, older workers who were employed in manual work before retirement, experienced the largest gains in vitality and deepest declines in fatigue post-retirement. No such effects were found for energy. Conclusions. Older workers experiencing low baseline vitality and high baseline fatigue and those in manual labor may benefit from early retirement. Since early retirement is financially unfavorable, it is essential to provide these groups of workers with workplace vitality interventions that may not only improve their vitality and quality of working life, but also extend their participation in the labor market.
机译:背景。过去的研究揭示了退休对各种健康措施的影响。然而,没有研究退休对生命力的影响,身体健康的整体衡量标准。为了启动,很少有研究已经解决了退休的健康后果的异质性。本研究调查了退休对活力的影响,以及如何影响1)手工工作和2)基线活力的影响。方法。分析基于2015年和2018年荷兰收集的NIDI养恤金面板调查的两波。来自4,156名更老工人(n = 4,156)的数据,其中波浪之间退休的1,934名(46.5%)。活力以三种方式评估,如:1)活力的复合措施及其子组分2)能量和3)疲劳。结果。条件改变OLS回归模型表明退休改善活力并降低疲劳。这些效果是异质的。由于在退休前的疲劳和增加疲劳增加的老年工人,退休更有利。同样,在退休前在手工工作中雇用的老年人经历了最大的生命力和退休后疲劳疲劳下降的最大衰退。没有发现能量的这种效果。结论。经历低基线生命力和高基线疲劳以及手工劳动力的老年工人可能会受益于早期退休。自早期退休以来,财务状况是不利的,必须为这些工作人员提供工作场所活力干预,这可能不仅可以提高其活力和工作生活质量,而且还扩展了他们参与劳动力市场。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号