首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Innovation in Aging >Advancing the Study of Subjective Age: More Seriously Considering Gender
【2h】

Advancing the Study of Subjective Age: More Seriously Considering Gender

机译:推进主观年龄的研究:更认真地考虑性别

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Socially-cued age expectations inform people’s subjective age - that is, how old they feel relative to their chronological age. Age-graded expectations are widely considered to be gendered, yet gender has not often been empirically examined as the scholarship on subjective age has developed. Because subjective age shapes the experiences a person has becoming and being an older adult, and is an important correlate of later life health, more seriously considering gender’s influence on subjective age is crucial to better understanding gender differences in older adults’ well-being. In our symposium we bring gender to the center of subjective age scholarship. Barrett, Michael, & Noblitt begin by establishing that subjective age research should portray gender as a social-level, rather than individual-level, characteristic. As a complement, Turner, Settersten, and Hooker illustrate how gender has or has not been included in the four theoretical domains of subjective age (self-perceptions of aging, old age stereotypes, age identity, and awareness of age related change), and offer insights into how gender might be included in future studies on each domain. We then shift to two papers presenting new empirical analyses on the role gender plays in subjective age. Kornadt shares how men and women’s commitment to certain social roles differentially informs their subjective age, while Settersten, Day, and Hagestad turn attention to a double standard of aging for women and men with evidence across Europe. Discussant Toni Calasanti closes by offering thoughts on the future of subjective age and gender scholarship, including considering gender beyond the binary.
机译:社会增加的时代预期可通知人们的主观年龄 - 也就是说,他们对他们的年龄年龄的感受多大。年龄评分预期被广泛认为是性别的,但由于对主观年龄的奖学金制定的奖学金,性别并未经验审查。由于主观年龄塑造了一个人已经成为和成为一个年长的成年人,并且是后期生命健康的重要相关性,更严重的考虑性别对主观年龄的影响对于更好地了解老年人福祉的性别差异至关重要。在我们的研讨会中,我们将性别带到主观年龄奖学金的中心。 Barrett,Michael,&Noblitt开始建立主观年龄研究应该将性别描绘为社会层面,而不是个人级别的特征。作为补充,特纳,塞尔斯滕和妓女说明了性别有关或尚未列入的是在患者的四个理论域名(老龄化,老龄刻板印象,年龄身份,年龄身份以及年龄相关变化的认识),以及提供有关在每个领域的未来研究中如何包含性别的见解。然后,我们转向两篇论文提出了对主观年龄的性别扮演的新实证分析。 Kornadt分享了男人和妇女对某些社会角色的承诺差异地通知他们的主观年龄,而斯特斯滕,日和哈伯拉德则注意欧洲妇女和男性的双重标准。讨论者Toni Calasanti通过向未来的主观年龄和性别奖学金提供思考,包括考虑超出二元的性别。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号