• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>International Journal of Clinical and Health Psychology : IJCHP >Was that (cyber)bullying? Investigating the operational definitions of bullying and cyberbullying from adolescents’ perspective
【2h】

Was that (cyber)bullying? Investigating the operational definitions of bullying and cyberbullying from adolescents’ perspective

机译：那是（网络）欺凌吗？从青少年的角度调查欺凌和威胁的操作定义

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务，本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文，但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁，仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况，如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Background/Objective: Despite the great interest that bullying and cyberbullying have received during the last decades, the problem of defining these phenomena is still debated. Recently, this discussion has also been articulated in terms of how young people who are directly involved in bullying and cyberbullying understand these notions. This study aimed at investigating the operational definitions of both bullying and cyberbullying provided by adolescent victims and perpetrators, by inquiring the weight of traditional criteria (i.e., frequency, deliberateness, imbalance of power, and harm) as well as dominance in the perception of these phenomena. Method: A total of 899 students aged between 11 and 16 years filled out the Student Aggression and Victimisation Questionnaire. Results: Common traits and differences between the operational definition of bullying and cyberbullying and between the perspectives of victims and perpetrators of aggression were found. The most relevant criterion for the perception of both these phenomena was clearly the presence of dominance. By contrast, the imbalance of power showed no significant relationship with the perception of being bullied or bullying others both offline and online. Conclusions: Findings emphasise that young people conceptualise bullying with a clear reference to relational and group processes, rather than to individual differences.
机译：背景/目的：尽管在过去几十年中收到了欺凌和网络欺凌的巨大兴趣，但仍然讨论了定义这些现象的问题。最近，这次讨论也在涉及直接涉及欺凌和网络欺凌的人的方式阐述。本研究旨在通过探讨传统标准的重量（即，对权力，权力和危害的频率，思考，失衡）以及对这些的影响，调查青少年受害者和肇事者提供的欺凌和犯罪者提供的欺凌和犯罪者的操作定义。现象。方法：共有899名年龄在11至16岁之间的学生填写了学生侵略和受害问卷。结果：发现欺凌和跨越网络武器的运作定义与侵略袭击者的观点之间的常见性状和差异。对这两种现象的感知最相关的标准显然是存在优势的存在。相比之下，权力的不平衡与欺负或欺凌的感知没有明显的关系，欺负他人在线和在线。结论：调查结果强调，年轻人概念欺凌，并清楚地参考关系和小组流程，而不是个人差异。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号