首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Reproductive Biomedicine Society Online >(Not) wanting to choose: outside agencies at work in assisted reproductive technology
【2h】

(Not) wanting to choose: outside agencies at work in assisted reproductive technology

机译:(不)想选择:在辅助生殖技术工作的外部机构

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Human choice and interventions that could seem to threaten the course of ‘nature’ or ‘chance’ are at the heart of controversies over assisted reproductive technology across Western countries. These debates focus predominately on so-called ‘selective reproductive technology’. While today, the technique of in-vitro fertilization (IVF) raises few political and bioethical debates in France and other Western countries, concerns remain that human intervention might replace ‘natural’ processes, threatening human procreation. These polemics focus on situations that require a decision, notably embryo selection and the fate of spare frozen embryos. The choices involved are induced by the technology and organized by the law. In the French legal system, IVF patients and professionals have the opportunity and, to a certain extent, the responsibility to decide on the status of in-vitro embryos. This article shows that, in these situations, both IVF patients and professionals invoke outside agencies (‘instances tierces’), both to avoid making decisions and to recover a world order in which procreation is not entirely subject to human decision. In short, there is a need to feel that procreation is not entirely dependent on human intervention; that individuals do not decide everything. It appears that the choices that are made, their nature and the type of outside agency that is invoked are highly situated.
机译:人类选择和干预似乎威胁到“自然”或“机会”的群体是对西方国家辅助生殖技术的争议的核心。这些辩论主要集中在所谓的“选择性生殖技术”上。而今天,在体外受精(IVF)提出了在法国和其他西方国家的一些政治和生物伦理辩论的技术,问题仍然存在,人类的干预可能取代“自然”的过程,威胁着人类的繁衍。这些趋势侧重于需要决定,特别是胚胎选择和备用冷冻胚胎的命运的情况。所涉及的选择是由技术引起的,并由法律组织。在法国法律制度中,IVF患者和专业人士有机会,在一定程度上,责任决定体外胚胎的状况。本文展示,在这些情况下,IVF患者和专业人员都援引外部机构(“实例蒂尔库”),无论是避免做出决策并恢复世界秩序,其中生育不完全受人决定。简而言之,需要觉得生育不完全取决于人为干预;个人不决定一切。似乎所做的选择,其性质和被调用的外部机构的类型高度位于。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号