首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>BMC Plant Biology >Plant extinction excels plant speciation in the Anthropocene
【2h】

Plant extinction excels plant speciation in the Anthropocene

机译:植物灭绝擅长植物形态在人体中的植物形态

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Differences of public and scientific attention to plant speciation and extinction. The public is more concerned with plant extinction (a), whereas scientists have a greater interest in plant speciation (b). We used Google Ngram’s millions of English-language books [37] to quantify the public attention on “plant speciation” and “plant extinction” during 1980–2008. The cumulative word frequency is 6.4 × 10− 8 and 8.0 × 10− 8 for plant speciation and extinction, respectively. We searched the core database of Web of Science for the publication of “plant speciation” and “plant extinction” during 1980–2018 to illustrate the academic concerns. The cumulative published papers are 6946 and 6651 on “plant speciation” and “plant extinction”, respectively. The searched research field was plant science, and the selected 10 journals of evolution and ecology: Annual Review of Ecology Evolution and Systematics, Biology Letters, BMC Evolutionary Biology, Evolution, Evolutionary Applications, Evolutionary Biology, Evolutionary Ecology, Proceedings of the Royal Society B-Biological Sciences, Systematic Botany, and Trends in Ecology & Evolution
机译:公众和科学对植物形态和灭绝的差异。公众更加关注植物灭绝(a),而科学家对植物形态(b)有更大的兴趣。我们使用谷歌Ngram的数百万英文书籍[37]来量化1980 - 2008年“植物形态”和“植物灭绝”的公众关注。累积的字频率分别为植物形态和灭绝的6.4×10-8和8.0×10-8。我们在1980 - 2018年期间搜索了“植物形态”和“植物资格”和“植物灭绝”的核心数据库,以说明学术问题。累计发表论文分别为6946和6651的“植物物种”和“植物灭绝”。搜索的研究领域是植物科学,所选的10个进化和生态期刊:生态演化和系统性的年度审查,生物学,BMC进化生物学,演化,进化应用,进化生物学,进化生态,皇家学会的诉讼程序B生态学,系统植物学和生态学趋势

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号