首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Inquiry: A Journal of Medical Care Organization Provision and Financing >Does Ownership Matter for Medical System Performance? Evidence From a Natural Experiment in Suqian China
【2h】

Does Ownership Matter for Medical System Performance? Evidence From a Natural Experiment in Suqian China

机译:医疗系统表现的所有权是否存在?来自中国宿迁自然实验的证据

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

There has long been a major policy debate on the role of hospital ownership (private vs public) in medical system performance. China’s health care delivery system is mainly a public system. In 2000, a full privatization reform was implemented in the city of Suqian, offering a unique opportunity to assess possible effects of private delivery based on a major external shock to the existing system. Compared with all other cities in Jiangsu province since 2003, Suqian did not experience any greater increase either in total outpatient or inpatient expenditures. In the meantime, Suqian performed equally well as other cities in terms of changes in number of inpatient admissions and average inpatient days, and even better for mortality rate in emergency rooms. This study concludes that under appropriate public financing, private delivery can serve the public demand at least equally well as public providers in terms of cost inflations and utilizations.
机译:关于医院所有权(私人与公众)在医疗系统绩效中的作用,长期以来一直是一项重大政策辩论。中国的医疗保健系统主要是公共系统。 2000年,苏千市实施了全面的私有化改革,提供了一个独特的机会,可以根据现有系统的主要外部冲击评估私人交付的可能影响。与自2003年以来江苏省所有其他城市相比,宿迁并没有在总出门诊或住院支出中获得任何更大的增加。与此同时,苏谦在住院入住录取数和平均内部的变化方面同样地表现得同样很好,甚至更好地在急诊室中的死亡率。本研究结论认为,在适当的公共融资下,私人送货可以在成本通量和利用方面至少同样地提供公共供应商的公共需求。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号