• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Journal of Medical Education and Curricular Development >Modernising Anatomy Teaching: Which Resources Do Students Rely On?
【2h】

Modernising Anatomy Teaching: Which Resources Do Students Rely On?

机译：现代化解剖学教学：学生依赖哪些资源？

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务，本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文，但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁，仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况，如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

The way in which we learn anatomy has changed exponentially over the decades and students now have access to lecture notes, textbooks, computer-assisted programmes, and a wide variety of internet based information. This study explored which resources were the most (and least) useful for a group of first year, undergraduate, medical students, with minimal prior content exposure (aged 18 and 19 years old, n = 76), over an 18 month period. Anatomy websites were found to be the most useful (30%), followed by tutorials (20%) and lectures (19%). A total of 13% found the university computer-assisted learning (CAL) platform least useful. We subsequently enhanced our ‘urogenital’ CAL anatomy module, with inclusion of new and updated images, videos and tutorials, as well as, digital and printed 3D-models. A post-intervention survey (n = 81) showed an increase from 12% to 27% for CAL as being most useful, and a decrease from 13% to 3% as being least useful. Our results provided a snapshot of students’ preferences in studying anatomy, and highlighted the importance of digital platforms and the need for evaluating our own learning resources. We must be mindful that there is an increasing tendency for students to rely on the Internet for information, which may expose them to unfiltered and unreliable content. We conclude that educators must be aware of the spectrum of learning resources used by students, to ensure that our own Institutional eLearning platforms are optimised to meet the diverse needs of learners.
机译：我们学习解剖学的方式在数十年中呈指数级改变，学生现在可以访问讲义笔记，教科书，计算机辅助程序以及各种基于互联网的信息。本研究探讨了哪些资源最多（最少）对第一年，本科本科，医学生，最低内容暴露（年龄18至19岁，N = 76），超过18个月。发现解剖网站是最有用的（30％），其次是教程（20％）和讲座（19％）。共有13％的人发现大学计算机辅助学习（CAL）平台最不有用。我们随后增强了我们的“泌尿生殖器”CAL解剖模块，包括包含新的和更新的图像，视频和教程，以及数字和印刷的3D模型。干预后调查（n = 81）表现为CAL的12％至27％，因为最有用，减少13％至3％，因为最有用。我们的结果提供了学生在研究解剖学方面的偏好的快照，并强调了数字平台的重要性以及评估我们自己的学习资源的必要性。我们必须注意到学生依赖互联网的信息越来越大，这可能会使他们暴露于未经过滤和不可靠的内容。我们得出结论，教育工作者必须了解学生使用的学习资源的频谱，以确保我们自己的机构电子学习平台经过优化，以满足学习者的各种需求。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号