• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Psychologica Belgica >A Stakeholder Perspective on Ethical Leadership in Sport: Bridging the Gap Between the Normative and Descriptive Lines of Inquiry
【2h】

A Stakeholder Perspective on Ethical Leadership in Sport: Bridging the Gap Between the Normative and Descriptive Lines of Inquiry

机译：对运动道德领导的利益攸关方视角：弥合规范性和描述性探究性的差距

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务，本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文，但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁，仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况，如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

This critical PhD review paper examines existing scholarship on ethical leadership in sport. Following a general trend in business ethics and related fields, ethical leadership has gained considerable research attention in sport over the last decades. Within this growing body of literature, ethical leadership is often presented as part of the desired strategic response of sport organizations to tackle the so-called dark side of sport (i.e., formed by such ethical issues as abuse, violence, management fraud, match-fixing, and doping). However, this critical PhD review paper argues that the current body of literature on ethical leadership in sport has matured along two strongly related yet quite isolated lines of inquiry: a normative (i.e., philosophical) and a descriptive (i.e., empirical) line. While the normative line of inquiry focuses on what ethical leadership in sport should look like based on moral reasoning, the descriptive line examines how ethical leadership in sport is perceived in practice and how it relates to certain antecedents and outcomes. As both lines offer complementary insights, we advocate future research to bridge this gap to come to an improved understanding of ethical leadership in sport. To this aim, we propose a broad stakeholder perspective on ethical leadership in sport, in which necessary attention is given to how all involved stakeholders make sense of ethical leadership as a socially constructed and context-dependent phenomenon.
机译：这份关键的博士审查纸张审查了现有的运动伦理领导奖学金。在商业伦理和相关领域的一般趋势之后，在过去的几十年中，道德领导力在运动中取得了相当大的研究。在这种不断增长的文学体系中，伦理领导往往是体育组织的所需战略反应的一部分，以解决运动所谓的黑暗面（即，通过这种道德问题形成的滥用，暴力，管理欺诈，匹配固定和掺杂）。然而，这篇关键的博士法审查论文认为，目前在运动中的道德领导的文献体系沿着两个强烈相关但相当孤立的调查线成熟：规范性（即哲学）和描述性（即经验）线。虽然规范的查询线侧重于基于道德推理的运动中的伦理领导，但描述性线路探讨了在实践中如何看待运动的道德领导以及如何与某些先发制人和结果有关。随着两条线路提供互补的见解，我们提倡未来的研究以弥合这种差距来提高对运动道德领导的理解。为此目的，我们提出了一种广泛的利益攸关方对运动的道德领导层的观点，其中涉及所有参与利益攸关方如何成为社会构建和上下文依赖现象的道德领导地位。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号