• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Nutrients >Polish Translation and Validation of the Mini Sarcopenia Risk Assessment (MSRA) Questionnaire to Assess Nutritional and Non-Nutritional Risk Factors of Sarcopenia in Older Adults
【2h】

Polish Translation and Validation of the Mini Sarcopenia Risk Assessment (MSRA) Questionnaire to Assess Nutritional and Non-Nutritional Risk Factors of Sarcopenia in Older Adults

机译：波兰语翻译和验证迷你桑普尼亚风险评估（MSRA）调查问卷以评估老年人SARCOPENIA的营养和非营养危险因素

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务，本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文，但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁，仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况，如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

A simple, short, cheap, and reasonably sensitive and specific screening tool assessing both nutritional and non-nutritional risk factors for sarcopenia is needed. Potentially, such a tool may be the Mini Sarcopenia Risk Assessment (MSRA) Questionnaire, which is available in a seven-item (MSRA-7) and five-item (MSRA-5) version. The study’s aim was Polish translation and validation of both MSRA versions in 160 volunteers aged ≥60 years. MSRA was validated against the six sets of international diagnostic criteria for sarcopenia used as the reference standards. PL-MSRA-7 and PL-MSRA-5 both had high sensitivity (≥84.9%), regardless of the reference standard. The PL-MSRA-5 had better specificity (44.7–47.2%) than the PL-MSRA-7 (33.1–34.7%). Both questionnaires had similarly low positive predictive value (PL-MSRA-5: 17.9–29.5%; PL-MSRA-7: 14.4–25.2%). The negative predictive value was generally high for both questionnaires (PL-MSRA-7: 89.8–95.9%; PL-MSRA-5: 92.3–98.5%). PL-MSRA-5 had higher accuracy than the PL-MSRA-7 (50.0–55% vs. 39.4–45%, respectively). Based on the results, the Mini Sarcopenia Risk Assessment questionnaire was successfully adopted to the Polish language and validated in community-dwelling older adults from Poland. When compared with PL-MSRA-7, PL-MSRA-5 is a better tool for sarcopenia risk assessment.
机译：需要简单，短，廉价，合理的筛选工具，评估营养和非营养危险因素的肌肉营养。潜在的，这种工具可能是迷你SARCOPENIA风险评估（MSRA）问卷，其在七件（MSRA-7）和五项（MSRA-5）版本中提供。该研究的目的是波兰语翻译和验证160岁≥60年龄的志愿者的MSRA版本。根据使用作为参考标准的Sarcopenia的六套国际诊断标准验证了MSRA。无论参考标准如何，PL-MSRA-7和PL-MSRA-5都具有高灵敏度（≥84.9％）。 PL-MSRA-5比PL-MSRA-7更好的特异性（44.7-47.2％）（33.1-34.7％）。两种调查问卷都同样低的阳性预测值（PL-MSRA-5：17.9-29.5％; PL-MSRA-7：14.4-25.2％）。对问卷的负面预测值通常高（PL-MSRA-7：89.8-95.9％; PL-MSRA-5：92.3-98.5％）。 PL-MSRA-5的精度高于PL-MSRA-7（分别为50.0-55％，分别为39.4-45％）。根据结果​​，迷你SARCOPENIA风险评估问卷由波兰语言成功通过，并在来自波兰的社区住宅老年人核实。与PL-MSRA-7相比，PL-MSRA-5是SARCOPENIA风险评估的更好工具。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号